<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>New Tampa Real Estate - Will the Real Rotten Neighbor Please Stand Up? - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/45/blog_posts/57-will-the-real-rotten-neighbor-please-stand-up-#comments</link>
    <description>Comments from 'Will the Real Rotten Neighbor Please Stand Up?' in New Tampa Real Estate at BiggerPockets.com</description>
    <item>
      <title>Comment #1 by Joshua Dorkin - 01:36AM, 10/09/2008</title>
      <link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/45/blog_posts/57-will-the-real-rotten-neighbor-please-stand-up-#c_68</link>
      <guid>http://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/45/blog_posts/57-will-the-real-rotten-neighbor-please-stand-up-#c_68</guid>
      <description>Hey Calum and good luck with your blog!  I agree with you completely about the premise of that website.  I've seen many businesses harmed by anonymous reviews on the internet, and this would be just like that.  If done correctly, the reporter  in this case should be required to include their real name, address, and a phone number for verification purposes - it doesn't all need to be public, but it would guarantee that those people making the reports are willing to stand by them.  

That said, I see it as a dangerous tool that could lead to some serious problems and cause feuds, and potentially worse.  

This is another one of those things that I just don't think needs to exist . . . probably causes more problems than anything else.

If you want to screen the neighbors, then get on your feet and screen the neighbors!</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

