Skip to content
Welcome! Are you part of the community? Sign up now.
x

Posted over 9 years ago

Long- and Short-Term Outlooks on the Multifamily Apartment Market

The last few weeks have seen the release of a great deal of research on housing, much of it relevant to apartment ownership. The conclusions are mostly welcome to investors in multifamily real estate: (1) the outlook appears rosy for apartment owners for the rest of 2014; though (2) vacancies could climb in 2015 as new supply comes online; and (3) the supply and demand fundamentals appear favorable to owners in the longer term.

2014: A Great Year to Own Multifamily Real Estate

One unambiguous conclusion of this research is that 2014 is shaping up to be a banner year for the owners of multifamily rental properties. As reported in Multifamily Executive and Multihousing News, the Dallas-based research firm Axiometrics recently reported that annualized year-to-date rent growth through June was 4.6% nationally, putting multifamily on track to have its “strongest year of the recovery,” which began in 2009. Occupancy rates nationwide exceeded 95%, according to the study. Rent growth is slower in urban cores, where new building has been most intense since the recovery began, but outside the big city centers supply has lagged demand. “Suburban and class B properties tend to have the best rent growth at this point,” Jay Denton, Axiometrics’ vice president of research, was reported as saying.[1]

Earlier in the month, Denton and KC Sanjay, also of Axiometrics, explained in a column in Multifamily Executive that five basic reasons underlie the current strong occupancy. First, supply is constrained because few rental properties were built in the early recovery years, and new supply in 2012 and 2013 grew by only 1.3% annually, below the long-term average of 1.5%. New supply in 2014 will barely reach the historic average. All the while, older, obsolete properties are being torn down at an accelerating rate.

Second, Dention and Sanjay say, single-family homes are less popular than they once were: the home ownership rate has declined to 64.8%, its lowest level since 1995. Third, the “millennial” generation is not yet ready to buy, partly because they still want to live in urban cores where they have to rent and partly because they are deferring life events like marriage and parenthood that usually lead people to buy a home. Fourth, because of the strengthening economy, many millenials who had been doubling up with friends or Mom and Dad, are starting to leave and form their own households. Typically, newer and younger households are renters rather than owners. Finally, most of the new supply of rental properties is urban-core, class A luxury property that appeals to professionals who used to buy homes instead. This new supply does not affect occupancies at older properties, which usually rent to a different demographic at a lower price point. In sum, the authors say, the current recovery is differing from previous ones as the pent-up demand from new household formations is flowing into rentals at a greater rate than in past recoveries.[2]

2015: A Bumpy Year Ahead for Apartment Occupancy?

Despite the rosy forecasts for the rest of 2014, some researchers express caution about 2015. One such researcher is Ryan Severino, associate director of research at the commercial research firm, Reis. Though he forecasts that rent growth will continue in 2015, he believes it will be tempered by the new supply coming online next year, causing “fundamentals in the market to weaken for the first time since 2009.” Demand for rental apartments will continue to be strong, he writes, because home ownership for people under age 35 fell to 36% earlier this year, the lowest since records began to be kept in 1982. Though an improving economy will improve the job situation for the under-35 group, the corresponding increase in demand will fall short of the forecast increase in supply. Severino is careful to note that the “ramp-up in supply [won’t be] consistent across markets,” and the “majority of units being developed are Class A,” meaning that they will be beyond the reach of many renters.[3]

Long-Term Fundamentals May Favor Owners of Rental Properties

Many people already believe that “the rent is too damned high.” They won’t like the direction that rents appear to be heading in the future, as the supply of apartments looks to lag demand for the foreseeable future.

A recent post on the “Housing Perspectives” blog published by the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies sheds light on this issue. Demand for apartments has climbed dramatically in recent years: “from 2005 to 2013, the U.S. saw a net increase of around 740,000 renter households per year. This far exceeds historical renter household growth of around 410,000 per year on average from the 1960s through the 2000s.” Furthermore, the blog reports, “supply of multifamily rental units – which house over 60 percent of all renter households – did not keep up,” as new supply lagged demand nationally by nearly 200,000 units in 2010 and 170,000 units in 2011. By last year, construction completions were nearly equal with rental household growth. However, the growth in supply is uneven, with the volume of construction permits lagging historical levels in more than half of the metro areas in the United States. Echoing Denton and Sanjay’s point that most new construction is of class A luxury apartments in the urban cores, the Harvard blog also points out that new construction is not contributing very much to the supply of housing for less affluent renters.[4]

Meanwhile, a blog post on Freddie Mac’s website by David Brickman, EVP of Multifamily Business, argues that “[g]iven current trends in renting and multifamily rental-housing inventory, apartment demand should exceed supply for years to come.” Brickman cites a Harvard study to suggest that “[d]emographic forces alone could create as many as 4.7 million more renter households by 2023.” In the meantime, even with annual construction returning to historic levels, he writes: “we’re looking at about 3.1 million new units over the next ten years. Not enough.” Indeed, even without this forecasted shortfall, existing “[s]upply already could be 1.5 million apartments short, by some estimates. And low vacancy rates have sped up rent growth – faster than inflation and income growth.”[5]

Though apartment owners will certainly benefit from the imbalance of supply and demand in their favor, it comes at a price to the economy as a whole. The Harvard Joint Center attributes the strong demand for apartments to the fall in home ownership rates, particularly among those aged 25-44, which in turn results from the dramatic decline in real incomes among this group. The home ownership rate and real median income for this group are both at levels not seen since the early 1970s.[6] Moreover, with rents consuming an ever greater proportion of people’s incomes, renters have less money “left over to buy other goods and services, such as food and healthcare,” negatively impacting their quality of life as well as the national economy.[7]

[1] “Occupancy Stays Above 95% in June,” Multifamily Executive, 22 July 2014;“Apartment Market Remains Strong in First Half of 2014,” Multihousing News, 24 July 2014.

[2] Jay Denton and KC Sanjay, “5 Reasons Occupancy is Growing Stronger,” Multifamily Executive, 9 July 2014.

[3] Ryan Severino, “Bumpy Road Ahead for Occupancies,” Multifamily Executive, August 2014.

[4] Elizabeth La Juenesse, “Rental Supply is Catching up with Strong Demand, but not for Affordable Units,” Housing Perspectives blog, July 11, 2014.

[5] David Brickman, “Multifamily Housing Can’t Live on Construction Alone,” in Executive Perspectives blog on Freddie Mac’s website, posted July 14, 2014.

[6] Chris Herbert, “What Will Stop the Slide in Homeownership Rates? Keep Your Eye on Incomes,” Housing Perspectives blog, July 2, 2014.

[7] La Jeunesse, July 11, 2014.



Comments (11)

  1. @Tom Lafferty I have no crystal ball, obviously, so take what I say with a big grain of salt.  My personal feeling is that what we experienced in the last decade was a once-in-a-lifetime downturn, akin to the Great Depression.  It probably would have been another Great Depression without the aggressive government action, in both fiscal and monetary policy, to keep it to just a terrible recession and not something even worse.  

    That being said, when the next downturn comes, and it will certainly come, it won't be as bad as the last one.  It will be more akin to previous downturns.  I don't think that values will fall through the floor as with last time.  They will suffer, but it won't be calamitous.  (But note that I have not been through a down cycle myself, other than following things closely in the news, and I read a lot of economics history.  But I cannot say I have personal experience in dealing with a down cycle.)

    One way to provide a little buffer against the cycles is to be investing in places where the cycles have not been so violent.  That's part of the reason I invest in South Carolina.  There is a steadily growing population to keep apartments full, but the cycles have been mild, even in the bubble period.  There was no great run-up in prices and a milder downturn than elsewhere.  The reason I avoid Texas is that I see a bubble forming there.  I know there is a great energy and jobs story there, but when I see everyone rushing into a market, I want to run the other way.  The investor enthusiasm can quickly outrun the economic fundamentals. Florida is another place that is famously subject to boom and bust.  Too much construction during boom times leads to too much excess capacity during the busts.  In South Carolina (other than Charleston), you can still buy at cap rates around 7.5% or so.  That gives me comfort that we can weather a downturn.  (And, as I said, our hold period is ten years, so that covers a lot of sins.)

    Another thing that is important is to make sure that, if you are buying at full market value, that you are buying strong properties and not using too much leverage.  Make sure your debt coverage ratios are as high as possible, not just the minimum that the bank requires.  (I like to be above 1.6x, even though banks usually require about 1.25x.) Use conservative underwriting and be prepared to turn down deals that don't pencil out on conservative assumptions.  You may want to decrease the amount of leverage you are using now, to make sure that, in five years' time, when you need to refi, you have a smaller amount to refi.

    @Nick Keesee I've heard elsewhere that your play at this point in the cycle is to add value and flip.  That probably makes sense, but you also need to be careful because you don't want to be the last guy buying to flip and get stuck with a property you need to sell and can't sell.  I think that, at the end of the day, if you are really worried about where the markets are going or your ability to exit, you need to be conservative and wait until you are in a different part of the cycle that makes you more comfortable.  But, then again, if you are doing this for a living, you need to be doing deals in order to put food on the table.  It's a tough balancing act.


  2. Great information for anyone looking to jump into owning an apartment building. Thanks @Jonathan Twombly


  3. @Jonathan Twombly , I was JUST logging into BP to post a question to which you just posted the answer!  I bought an apartment complex in 2014 that is basically the scenario that @Nick Keesee described.  It is stabilized, but we've still been able to add quite a bit of value in a short time.  

    When you mention hold period, what do you think of a 5 yr hold at this point?  Thats the best we could get, and I certainly don't want to find that with increased interest rates in five years, we're in a situation of trying to refi or sell for less than we owe.  Obviously not all cycles are as dramatic as what happened a few years ago, but I'm looking for a second property and this is the biggest concern.  Short of buying a heavy value add deal, its a little scary to be buying at full market value.  A lot of smart people I've talked to feel we've got 2-3 more years before the MF market peaks (DFW), but with a 5 yr loan, that doesn't make me feel very good!

    Do you have experience in the downside of some apt cycles?


    1. Hey @Tom Lafferty A good friend of mine just hopped on a phone call will a commercial broker right where you are in Dallas. 

      The main reason for the call was to discuss the compressed cap rates and what he is seeing other investors doing in this market.  His main piece of advice was value add, value add, value add.  His point was even if you purchase a property at a 6-7 cap, your exit for the next couple years will probably be in the same range so a shorter term play still works extremely well.

      Just thought I would add that especially because you are in Dallas :)


  4. Great article, very informative!


  5. @Nick Keesee Your holding period also matters a lot.  If you are trying to flip property or exit in a short time, you can get caught short.  But if your hold period is long enough you can ride out the cycles and buying at the height of the market won't hurt very much.  Put another way, there is a strategy for every point in the market.  You have to choose the right one.


  6. @Nick Keesee 

    I'm not an economist, and I am reading the same information as everyone else and trying to make sense of it.  But my person opinion is that we may see some cap rates rising in some markets in the near future.  If debt becomes costlier, it will be reflected in what buyers are willing to offer for deals.  I seriously doubt there will be a huge change -- there is still a lot of liquidity out there and the steadily improving economy means more jobs and more renters.  But I can imagine a slow easing of cap rates as loose money begins to dry up. I don't think we will see any serious cap rate increases until the Fed starts to raise rates.  Right now, they are still only easing off the gas, not applying the brakes.

    The development certainly seems to be focused on A product, which is natural.  You can't build old stuff!  I think the thing to worry about here is in some markets that will get overbuilt to the point that A buildings offer good enough incentives to pull in B tenants, and B buildings then have to go after C tenants.  But, again, I don't anticipate this being a huge thing.  There is only so far down that the A properties will be willing to go on their rents, so the effect should be muted.

    The other thing to note -- again, my opinion only -- is that we are all shell-shocked because we just came out of a generational correction.  Of course, the business cycle continues, and when we go back into a down cycle, some people will suffer.  But it won't be cataclysmic.  It will just be a downturn in the normal course of things, and we will all ride it out.  I personally am looking forward to some panic selling by people who think that the Great Recession is coming back, but I don't think it will be widespread.


    1. Great thoughts and opinions @Jonathan Twombly 

      I just spoke to a mentor of mine on the phone and one of his key thoughts is that you can buy a property at full price even with compressed cap rates and still add value if you know what to look for and how to do it.

      I think that's such a great point because I hear far too many people saying they can't find deals anywhere but that really challenges that thinking.


  7. Thanks for sharing @Jonathan Twombly 

    I'm curious to your thoughts on what cap rates will do in 2015 with the fed already announcing they will begin tapering thus raising interest rates combined with this article stating potential occupancy concerns within primary markets?

    I too have noticed that the new development projects seem to be more focused on class A or even B+ which wouldn't affect C and B- class assets as much.

    Thanks!


  8. Thank you @Patrick Kavanagh .  Glad I could be of interest to you.


  9. great article thank you