Just starting out and wanted to hear what some of your opinions are on this i can think of some good and bad for both sides just wanting to hear from more experienced investors on what seems to work the best thanks
Just starting out and wanted to hear what some of your opinions are on this i can think of some good and bad for both sides just wanting to hear from more experienced investors on what seems to work the best thanks
I am NOT an experienced investor however with current market conditions buy and hold is the way to go. Properties are pretty cheap these days and with all the forclosures out there people need a place to live, finding tenantes might be a bit easier. If you were to flip, financing is difficult for many to obtain therefore your house would take a lot longer to sell creating more carrying costs. Flipping is a gamble and takes a lot of hard work and knowledge. I'm not sure what your background is but get as much information as possible before you take the plunge.
Good Luck,
Heather
PS: Get to know your local market, things might be different for you. This is just a generalized statement based on what our country is going through currently.
IMHO, flipping is a means of aquiring the buy and hold properties. Rehabbing is for short term capital gains, however, the buy and hold strategy is for wealth building. I think using one to feed the other is the best path, rather than just concentrating on one over the other
Flipping, whether you mean fix and flip or wholesaling, is a real estate business. Buy and hold is real estate investing. The difference is that a business is an active pursuit. You do the business (or, have your employees/contractors do it), and you make money. Investment is more passive. If you hire out the management and maintenance, its nearly completely passive. You invest your money and (hopefully) get a return. The management and maintenance aspects of buy and hold are really businesses. Some investors choose to outsource that, others do it themselves.
They're both different models. Charles, is right. Flipping generated chunks of cash and holding is a long-term game.
It depends what is right for you, and the condition of the market you live in. But if you learn to buy right - either model will make you a lot of money.
It definitely depends on your local market. Houses are still selling across the country but what your local market is doing makes a huge difference. I think buying and renting is definitely a safer bet right now in most parts of the country, but that doesn't mean flipping is not still viable.
If you are looking to flip houses then you need to study up on how houses are selling or not selling in your market.
Don't just look at houses that have sold but look at the houses that haven't sold. Your "dud" ratio is what I call it. How many expired listings were there in that same time frame as your comps? What is your market's inventory (the total number of houses for sale for that month divided by the pending and sold listings for that month)? I like to see a dud ratio of less than 25%, and an inventory of 6 months or less.
You also need to understand the local economy. Is your local economy staying strong through these tough times or is it taking a hit or is it in freefall?
One more thing I would consider is the rate of foreclosures for your local market. An influx of REO's (Real Estate Owned - foreclosed houses that banks are reselling) can drastically decrease housing prices in an area.
Now if these factors are not what is desired, the key is to adjust your expected sell price.
Price overcomes all objections.
Even in some of the worst markets in the country, houses are still selling. Now they may be selling for pennies on the dollar, LITERALLY, but they are still selling.
If comps for the last 3 to 6 months on a house come in at $100,000, but 50% of listings expire, the housing inventory is at 9 months, and the local economy is stable with a slightly increased number of foreclosures then I would look at adjusting that ARV (After Repaired Value - what it will sell for all fixed up) down 5-10% to compensate. I would go back to my comps and see how my house would compare with the others sold if mine was selling at $90,000 or $95,000.
If your local economy is in free fall or foreclosures in your area have gone through the roof then you will need to adjust your ARV down even more. You might be looking at $80,000 to $85,000 or even less depending on the severity of your local market. The idea is to compare your projected ARV with what is currently selling on the market and to factor in local changes in supply and demand (as with increased foreclosures and/or dwindling economy) to get a conservative idea of what that house will sell for in the time you want to sell it in.
If houses are staying on the market for 9 months at what you are expecting to sell your house for, then knock 10% off and see how it compares now.
Point being, price overcomes all objections.
I feel like you should do both if you are able. The buy and hold is a sure way to creating wealth and free retirement. The buy and flip or rehab and flip enables you to see a CASH return instantly, whereas the buy and hold is only a paper return. Both are great.
All investors don't fit in the same cookie cutter. Some have high income and tax consequences. To them, a buy and flip doesn't do much after adding additional taxes. They might be better off holding for awhile.
To the guy not earning big income and having big taxes, a buy and flip provides more bang for his buck.
Chris C, if you're interested in flipping, you might want to follow this thread. Title seasoning is becoming an issue for both conforming and FHA loans.
http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/92/topics/25417?page=2
Caitlyn, some of your information seems to be misleading.
Seasoning issues have not changed for FHA loans. They have prohibited loans on properties with less than 90 day seasoning for over 2 years now, and conforming loans are still self regulated by each lender. Though conforming lenders are getting more restrictive, flipping is still a very viable opportunity.
While I'm extremely new to investing, I guess the answer would depend on what your goals are.
For us, we plan on buying and holding (renting). We hope to build our investment portfolio over the next 10 years with several properties. With the end goal being that when we retire we will have either A) Rental income streams and/or B) Property that will go back up to market value that we can sell.
I hope that our goals are realistic. I look at them in a modest way because I don't see it as a get rich quick plan, but rather to give us the ability to have a more financially comfortable retirement when the time comes.
Raise your sights!! If you can buy 1 home a year for 20 years, you'll be able to retire and never work another day of your life. (based on following)
1. Buy at market value or less
2. Rent and when rents increase, use the amount to pay off loan in 20 years.
3. Leaving your investment program funds alone.
4. Never sell .Refi House # 1 in the 21st year..All proceeds are tax free.
5. We have some semblance of inflation to increase rents and values.
Opposing viewpoints are always welcome...
Thanks for all the replies Rich that was kind of the plan i was going for i was thinking right along those lines just maybe a 15 year plan instead of the 20
Nice that you are thinking 15 years. If you accomplish it in less than 6, you'll beat me!! Good luck and keep posting.
What about a balance. Income now and wealth later?
You'll reach your goals sooner if you turn this around. Create wealth(acquisition) now and let the income come later. Jackson, MS. I heard it has slowed down a lot. I'm buying and developing in Gulfport area to offset all my tax consequences. I love that Bonus Depreciation and the SRAP. What a country!! Earn hundreds of thousands and pay ZERO in taxes.
Edit: I think you are saying to take a loan on the house in year 21 and use it to buy more real estate?
The refi in year 21, is to pull out profit for retirment tax free. Of course the home now has debt to service so the cash flow is reduced, but so what. You are now retired and just want to live off all the equity you have built over the 20 years.
Interest rate is not so much a factor other than the cost of the loan and the total amount of reduction in cash flow on that property. Then repeat process for home two in year two of retirement. Or you could always buy more if you choose.
Will Barnard, Barnard Enterprises, Inc.
E-Mail: info@barnardenterprises.com
Website: http://www.barnardenterprises.com
info@barnardenterprises.com
i've done the figures on both and I always come to the conclusion its better to rent. Of course sometimes it is better to sell, just need to look at what you want to accomplish.
No need for one or the other.
Do both. Holding long term creates wealth and selling for quick profits now brings in needed capital to make additional purchases, or to use for living expenses if that is the case.
The plan Rich laid out is great. Use it. Add to it a few sales each year for chunks of capital and repeat process.
Will Barnard, Barnard Enterprises, Inc.
E-Mail: info@barnardenterprises.com
Website: http://www.barnardenterprises.com
info@barnardenterprises.com
Will- your previous 2 posts were very complimentary. Thank you. I'll add 1 thing to the retirement plan. NEVER need to sell the home outright. You can always exchange it 1031 to defer taxes, or refi it again in year 41??? I wish I'd have kept 100 of the homes I bought in Cal in the 70's. I'd be richer Rich now..