This is an update-
I have had many indivduals come up to me and tell me that their feeling was a negative one due to the fact that they are paying a lot less for attorney access. They told me they felt that they would rather pay more and get a better attorney on their side when the time came (it would be better to pay a lot more than to suffer the loss in court).
But I recently found out that attorneys are graded by a system called:
Martindale-Hubbell system;
There are two components to each Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating:
1. Legal Ability Ratings Legal Ability Ratings take into consideration the standard of professional ability in the area where the lawyer practices, the lawyer's expertise, and other professional qualifications. If a lawyer's practice is limited or specialized, Peer Review Ratings are based on performance in those specific fields of law. Legal Ability Ratings are: C - Good to High B - High to Very High A - Very High to Preeminent
2. General Ethical Standards Rating The General Ethical Standards Rating denotes adherence to professional standards of conduct and ethics, reliability, diligence and other criteria relevant to the discharge of professional responsibilities. The General Recommendation Rating is: V - Very High A lawyer will not receive a Legal Ability Rating unless he or she has been endorsed for a " V."
CV Peer Review Rating — an excellent first Rating and a statement of a lawyer's above average ability and very high ethics.
BV Peer Review Rating — an indication of an exemplary reputation and well-established practice. A typical lawyer is in mid-career, with a significant client base and high professional standing.
AV Peer Review Rating — shows that a lawyer has reached the height of professional excellence. He or she has usually practiced law for many years, and is recognized for the highest levels of skill and integrity.
I have looked up provider lawyers of Pre-Paid legal and have found out that most of them are AV rated Lawyers!
Thoughts?