NEW: BP Podcast 66: Flips, Apartments, & Protecting Yourself From Professional Tenants with Michael Blank

Hide this

From the BiggerPockets Blog

 BiggerPockets Blog »

Jump to Forum View All

Click a category below to view different forum categories.

BiggerPockets

General Info

BiggerPockets Q&A, Site Questions, & Announcements

1515 topics, 14405 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:28PM

BiggerPockets Exclusive PRO Area

117 topics, 839 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 05:47AM

New Member Introductions

10892 topics, 85669 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 12:51PM

Real Estate Success Stories

396 topics, 6158 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 08:32AM

General Real Estate

General Real Estate

Buying & Selling Real Estate

5940 topics, 46809 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 12:15PM

Renters

643 topics, 5817 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 09:29AM

Get Foreclosure Help - Help Stop Foreclosure Forum

316 topics, 2557 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 03:58AM

Home Owner Association (HOA) Issues & Problems Forum

237 topics, 1609 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:53AM

Do it Yourself

654 topics, 6265 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 10:16AM

Reviews & Feedback

Real Estate Deal Analysis and Advice

3682 topics, 29513 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:38PM

Real Estate Guru, Book & Course Reviews and Discussions

1133 topics, 11562 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 12:17PM

Ask About A Real Estate Company

740 topics, 7318 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 11:52AM

Real Estate Investing

Real Estate Strategies

Wholesaling

5603 topics, 43734 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 12:37PM

Rehabbing and House Flipping

3334 topics, 31003 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:08PM

Real Estate Development & New Home Construction

553 topics, 4684 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 12:13PM

Innovative Strategies

703 topics, 6027 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 08:48AM

Tax Liens, Notes, Paper, & Cash Flows Discussion

866 topics, 6678 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 06:06AM

Rent to Own a.k.a. Lease Purchase, Lease Options

693 topics, 4891 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:13PM

1031 Exchanges

143 topics, 1054 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 08:41AM

Foreclosure Investing

General Foreclosure & Pre-Foreclosure Forums

1686 topics, 11286 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 05:56AM

HUD, VA, and Tax Sales

414 topics, 3089 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 12:05PM

REOs

1214 topics, 10576 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 11:48AM

Short Sales

1534 topics, 13120 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 04:44PM

Landlord & Tenant Forums

Landlord & Rental Property Questions

7205 topics, 70761 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:31PM

Mobile Homes & Mobile Home Park Investing

638 topics, 5141 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 09:49AM

Investor Basics

Starting Out

7704 topics, 60470 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:39PM

Investor Psychology

431 topics, 6104 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 06:08PM

General Real Estate Investing

4718 topics, 37205 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:06PM

Real Estate Investor Marketing

1731 topics, 14094 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 06:39AM

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial Real Estate Investing Forum

1410 topics, 8986 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:32PM

Multi-Family and Apartment Investing

1109 topics, 9231 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:20PM

The Business of Real Estate

Real Estate Technology and the Internet

Real Estate Technology, Social Media & Blogging

642 topics, 4897 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 11:10AM

Business Basics

Goals, Business Plans & Entities

831 topics, 7562 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 04:25PM

Real Estate Finance & Legal

Financial, Tax, and Legal

Tax, Legal Issues, Contracts, Self-Directed IRA

2786 topics, 20010 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 11:43AM

Property Insurance

309 topics, 2045 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:41PM

Personal Finance Discussion

328 topics, 2731 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 04:33PM

Loans, Mortgages, Credit Lines

Private & Conventional Lending Discussion

2833 topics, 19699 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 11:47AM

Creative Real Estate Financing

1209 topics, 8769 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 06:24AM

Crowdfunding Real Estate

35 topics, 461 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 05:17PM

Real Estate Professionals

Real Estate Professionals

Real Estate Agents

1210 topics, 7989 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 08:04AM

Bankers, Lenders, and Mortgage Brokers

441 topics, 1922 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 09:39AM

Contractors

268 topics, 1678 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 03:38AM

Local Real Estate

Local Real Estate

Local Real Estate Networking & Recommendations

1989 topics, 11611 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 12:07PM

Americans & International Real Estate

161 topics, 566 posts — Last Post 04/14/14, 11:19AM

Foreigners Buying in the USA

62 topics, 409 posts — Last Post 04/10/14, 06:27AM

Canadian Real Estate

64 topics, 428 posts — Last Post 04/18/14, 04:22AM

Marketplace

Real Estate Marketplace

Real Estate Marketplace

15016 topics, 53956 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 11:54AM

Real Estate Events and Happenings

164 topics, 2514 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 01:13PM

Off-Topic

Off Topic

Off-Topic

2905 topics, 32411 posts — Last Post 04/19/14, 08:03AM

Housing News & Real Estate Market

914 topics, 8351 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:41AM

BiggerPockets Real Estate Investing Summit

97 topics, 1751 posts — Last Post 04/10/14, 02:27PM

BiggerPockets Resources

Forums » Rehabbing and House Flipping » Hard Money + Equity Partner

Hard Money + Equity Partner

14 posts by 7 users

Signup

· Dallas, Texas


The plan is to flip a property using an equity partner to provide the cash reserves and a hard money lender for the bulk of the purchase and rehab.

We originally planned on all cash, in which case we would split gains/losses 50/50. Money partner would provide all the capital, and I would do all of the work (not the actual flipping work, we will use contractors).

Now, he's decided against using all cash and would instead like to contribute $50k to the deal and finance the rest with debt. How should this be split? My thought is that the $50 should be used as cash reserves. But will the equity still be split 50/50? I would think more like 30% to the equity partner and 70% to me. Is that off base?

Thanks!



Rehabber · Simi Valley, California


My thought would be he would get 50% of the profit from the percentage of the investment that his $50k buys. So let's say the total costs are $150k. He would then get 50% of 1/3 of the profit, because he is covering 1/3 of the total cost. If you gave him, as you suggest, 50% of the total profit, and the other lender 50% of the total profit, you would end up with 0. Even if you give the other lender a fixed percentage (such as a hard money lender), you would still be getting a raw deal. In my opinion, if he wants a profit split, it has to be proportional to his investment.



· Dallas, Texas


Mike,

That makes sense. We would be using hard money to finance. My partner's contribution would essentially be the ability to borrow, so perhaps we could get away with a smaller contribution from him into our business. As long as he can prove to the HML that he has the liquid assets to cover reserves, the HML should be happy, right?



Real Estate Investor · Naples, Florida


No matter his actual cash out of pocket, if he can bring 100% of the money to the deal that, in itself, might be worth something.

Just my .02

John Thedford
Naples, Florida



· Dallas, Texas


Originally posted by John Thedford:
No matter his actual cash out of pocket, if he can bring 100% of the money to the deal that, in itself, might be worth something.

Yes, true. I guess that whether it's all or just some from him, my contribution is still $0.



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


Zach, your deal was 50/50 with him providing funds, period.

Where he gets his funding is irrelevant. That assumes you will not be on the loan. However, if he encumbers the or your property, now you are assuming additional risk, what if he drops over and is incapacitated, blabbering in a nursing home from a stroke and his loan is foreclosed, you could lose the property.

So, it's not the same deal, it's one thing to not pay a partner, it's another not to pay a secured lender.

In reality, while he is having you at risk, you are contributing nothing to funding the deal, so even at that point, 50/50 could be fair, just realize that his leveraging the deal puts you at greater risk and perhaps gives you more motivation as well to perform.

Additionally, he can circumvent the partnership and take any obligation in default and follow through with remedies under that loan, outside your partnership. So it places him in a somewhat better position and he avoids any default/foreclsoure.

Another issue, a HML making a loan as an outside lender and taking an equity position is not only unethical but can be self dealing. The practice is illegal here. A lender outside of the business entity is a straight lender. A partner inside a company who lends money to the company is an entirely different situation and is common practice, but as a partner, accepts the risks inside that entity as well which an outside lender does not. Don't deal with HMLs who want that arrangement, IMO. In commercial arrangements, profits can be assigned as premiums, but I really doubt any small HML follows such premium structures based on the balances. Anyway, not sure this even applies as it wasn't clear, but sounded like the HML also wanted a slice. Another issue with those having money or access to money to lend and being unaware of the liabilities of lending or good practice being over shadowed by greed.

If you end up with a loan, you might consider signing the note too and justify any modification to the split if you can based on your risks assumed. But again, he who carries the water takes the first drink. Just my thoughts... :)


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


· Dallas, Texas


Originally posted by Bill Gulley:
Zach, your deal was 50/50 with him providing funds, period

In reality, while he is having you at risk, you are contributing nothing to funding the deal, so even at that point, 50/50 could be fair, just realize that his leveraging the deal puts you at greater risk and perhaps gives you more motivation as well to perform.



Originally posted by Bill Gulley:
If you end up with a loan, you might consider signing the note too and justify any modification to the split if you can based on your risks assumed. But again, he who carries the water takes the first drink. Just my thoughts... :)

The deal isn't 50/50, period. It's still in the works and we're making changes before nailing it all down.

I see in my original post where it may have looked like HE is the hard money lender. That's not the case. He's an equity partner contributing funds to the deal. The hard money lender is a third party providing debt to finance the deal. They won't have equity.

Our thought is that we will either be co-borrowers, or, if possible, the loan will be to an LLC of which we are the sole partners.

I see your point, that he is contributing 100% of the money and I'm doing 100% of the work, so whether or not the deal is financed could be irrelevant.

Knowing both of us or OUR LLC is on the loan, still 50/50?



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


Hmmm, I read 50/50, I do scan alot. Good to hear the HML is not doing that...

Here is kind of a tip....if you have a partner, often it is awkward for both to go to a lender at the same time and spill your personal financial information. The lender will see you seperately. Doing so also allows the lender to treat both fairly as borrowers, individually and discuss issues privately instead of in front of another party.

So, when you get the financing approved, neither party really knows who carried most of the water so to speak, who it was that really swings the deal. From that, each partner can deal on equal footing as they are both on the loan or at least both will guarantee the loan.

Then, by eliminating one feeling like "If it weren't for me, you wouldn't have a deal" you can then address other issues like who does most of the work or what ever you may have to deal with.

I'd say, unless you are related and sometimes even then, if one partner feels as if they are the deep pockets they will tend in cases to assume control if both have similar knowledge, you'll find many times of getting into the golden rule, he who has the gold makes the rules, almost human nature. Keeping your personal finances out of it helps avoid such issues.

Now, you might frame it as "WE" are getting the financing and "I" am doing 100% of the work. And negotiate your split. ;)


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Rehabber · Canton-Akron, Ohio


My quick take on this, If I had a 50/50 split agreement with a money partner, as I have done numerous times, and he wanted to borrow some of the money. I would keep it simple. He pays the costs of the borrowed money.


Dell Schlabach, BenchMark Properties
Telephone: 3304326927
Dell Schlabach BenchMark Properties


Rehabber · Santa Clarita, California


If your proposed deal was 50% split each with funding partner bringing the cash, but know wants to use leverage, then in my mind, you have a choice.
1. Split stays 50% and cost of funds comes out of his share.
2. Split stays 50% and cost of funds comes out of JV equally as with all other expenses.

Your 50% is derived and earned from finding the deal, contracting the deal, structuring of the deal, managing rehab, and managing exit.


Small_be_logoWill Barnard, Barnard Enterprises, Inc.
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: http://www.barnardenterprises.com
http://www.InvestorExperts.com


Rehabber · Santa Clarita, California


Caveat, if I was the funding partner and you lack a track record, I am not going to agree to pay for the cost of leveraged funds and I may ask that I get a larger share or that you have some amount of skin in the game.


Small_be_logoWill Barnard, Barnard Enterprises, Inc.
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: http://www.barnardenterprises.com
http://www.InvestorExperts.com


Rehabber · Simi Valley, California


I see. I thought the partner wanted to only bring $50k and you were going to be financing the rest of the deal with a loan. If he's still bringing all the money to the table (in other words, he's getting the loan), then I think it is fair if he still gets 50% of the profit. However, if you are expected to cover (or share) the costs of the loan, I don't think it's fair if he still gets 50% of the profit. That said, if this is your first deal and that's the only way he'll do it, you can always just suck it up and go for it. Just know that if you end up breaking even with no profit, YOU still LOST money because you had to pay the loan costs.



· Phoenix, Arizona


Hi Zack,

I was wondering what split you ended up going with on this project?



Rehabber · Santa Clarita, California


10 months later, yes, an update would be great, no matter what happened. Please do share at your next convenience.


Small_be_logoWill Barnard, Barnard Enterprises, Inc.
E-Mail: [email protected]
Website: http://www.barnardenterprises.com
http://www.InvestorExperts.com




Sign up