Foreclosure And Its Effect On Non-Foreclosure Homes
Author: Tom Koziol • URL: http://www.homeforeclosureprofits.com/hfp.htmlMay 23rd, 2008 •
Just Surfing for Foreclosure Information
As I was surfing the Net looking for foreclosure information, I stumbled across a study titled:
HOUSING POLICY DEBATE VOLUME 17 ISSUE 1
NOTE: The study is copyrighted by the Fannie Mae Foundation.
One of the co-authors, Geoff Smith, is a vice president at the Woodstock Institute, a policy group in Chicago. This study was conducted in Chicago between 1998 and 1999.
Foreclosure Study Findings
The study found that each foreclosure within an eighth of a mile of a single-family home results in a 0.9% decline in the home’s value. Smith is of the opinion that “If you were to replicate that study now, you’d probably find a bigger impact because there are more foreclosures and they’re bringing down the housing market overall.”
Since I am only familiar with the real estate market in a small geographic area, my first inclination is to agree with him. After all, foreclosed homes often fall victim to neglect and vandalism and what seems like a faster deterioration process. This has the inherent effect of dragging down the neighborhood.
Add the competition factor and I believe you have a formula that puts the decline figure into the 1 plus % range. Where it might have been 0.9%, it is now 1.7% to 1.9%.
Mind you, this is just one factor in the overall picture but given the numbers are large, it seems to be an important factor. If I am correct and it is 1.9% that means a house valued at $300,000 would decline $5700 on a straight line basis.
If this is a compounding number, the second year causes another 1.9% decline. I’ll assume the current real estate decline will be of only a two year duration. That may ease some of the sting in these declining numbers.
I put this (dated) study on the table to get some discussion about the relevance of its conclusion in today’s environment as well as to hear the actual experience in other parts of Foreclosure USA.
We all know foreclosures effect value. Calculating a precise percentage may be difficult but it is doable as the study proved. It would seem to me if we are investing in this market we would want to know as much as we can about price factors.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or sign up for our real estate social network. Thanks for visiting!
Tags: Economy, foreclosure, Foreclosures, home, house, housing, vacant home, vandalism
Joshua Dorkin
Charles Feldman
Ted Karsch.
Troy Schuricht
Richard Warren
Jim Watkins
Tom,
This is exactly the problem! Soon after a bank takes the property back at auction as in 90% of the current cases, the trustee re records that transaction, then weather auction or sold via Realtor the property is recorded again.
These days both transactions are usually below market value and thus there is now TWO below market comp withing a 2-9 month time table.
Lets re visit the numbers and give CA current statistics as an example of the volume were talking about here.
O.K. Let’s go State Wide and see how these figures relate to Tom’s subject matter:
http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/05/22/94/
case in point
Mr. Mortgage writes:
These homes are being sold at massive discounts to the note amount and pose the real threat to home prices across the nation. All over the country, neighborhoods are being marked-to-market overnight due to REO stock being dumped that was never shown as part of the listed housing stock in the first place. At 37.7% of all sales, this inventory is quickly becoming ‘the market’ and is rarely accounted for in the ‘month’s supply’ numbers released each month by the NRA because it is not listed in the MLS in most cases. I talk about it in my April Foreclosure Report released last week.
Amazing how the problem compounds itself, isn’t it? It seems the people who should know better, don’t.
It means the more foreclosing house we’ll have the whole economics balance degrade.