<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Municipal Bonds the Next Big Unknown Unknown?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2008/10/07/are-municipal-bonds-the-next-big-unknown-unknown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2008/10/07/are-municipal-bonds-the-next-big-unknown-unknown/</link>
	<description>Learn, Network, Invest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:55:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob R.</title>
		<link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2008/10/07/are-municipal-bonds-the-next-big-unknown-unknown/comment-page-1/#comment-60532</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/?p=1702#comment-60532</guid>
		<description>California is asking for a $7 Billion federal bailout now - instead of solving their problems thru taxation.

Nuveen bond funds - one of my favorite investments (past investment, thankfully) is headed for the basement as I write this note.  It&#039;s sure making the yields look terrific though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California is asking for a $7 Billion federal bailout now &#8211; instead of solving their problems thru taxation.</p>
<p>Nuveen bond funds &#8211; one of my favorite investments (past investment, thankfully) is headed for the basement as I write this note.  It&#8217;s sure making the yields look terrific though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Kennan</title>
		<link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2008/10/07/are-municipal-bonds-the-next-big-unknown-unknown/comment-page-1/#comment-60469</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/?p=1702#comment-60469</guid>
		<description>Next to US government Treasury bills, municipal bonds are just about the safest investment around. What your article fails to note is that states have a power that no corporation or private entity can possibly have -- -- the tax power. In other words, if a state has any prospect of default, it can raise taxes to pay off its bonds. In fact, in major states like California, the state constitution absolutely requires this. In a sense, municipal bonds are safer than Treasury bonds, because of a power the state lacks -- -- the power to print money. If the U.S. Treasury comes anywhere near the need to default on its debt, it has a choice of either raising taxes or printing money. Which do you think it will do in times like? We do need to make one important distinction, however. I am referring to what are called &quot;general obligation&quot; bonds. You would want to stick to these only, as opposed to municipal bonds backed by revenues, e.g., a hospital or sewer system. Any competent municipal bond broker can steer you to these. If you keep this in mind, you can have a long-term investment that is paying 5 1/2 percent tax-free right now, which is approaching the long-term expected returns from the stock market even in good times -- -- with the added plus of allowing you to sleep at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next to US government Treasury bills, municipal bonds are just about the safest investment around. What your article fails to note is that states have a power that no corporation or private entity can possibly have &#8212; &#8211; the tax power. In other words, if a state has any prospect of default, it can raise taxes to pay off its bonds. In fact, in major states like California, the state constitution absolutely requires this. In a sense, municipal bonds are safer than Treasury bonds, because of a power the state lacks &#8212; &#8211; the power to print money. If the U.S. Treasury comes anywhere near the need to default on its debt, it has a choice of either raising taxes or printing money. Which do you think it will do in times like? We do need to make one important distinction, however. I am referring to what are called &#8220;general obligation&#8221; bonds. You would want to stick to these only, as opposed to municipal bonds backed by revenues, e.g., a hospital or sewer system. Any competent municipal bond broker can steer you to these. If you keep this in mind, you can have a long-term investment that is paying 5 1/2 percent tax-free right now, which is approaching the long-term expected returns from the stock market even in good times &#8212; &#8211; with the added plus of allowing you to sleep at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
