<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Real Estate Down Payment: Gone in 60 Seconds?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2009/02/08/real-estate-payment-60-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2009/02/08/real-estate-payment-60-seconds/</link> <description>Learn, Network, Invest</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Laurie Morgan</title><link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2009/02/08/real-estate-payment-60-seconds/#comment-63733</link> <dc:creator>Laurie Morgan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/?p=4024#comment-63733</guid> <description>Interesting question. I think your overall point about &quot;doing the math&quot; is really the right one ... because if you paid higher points for a lower mortgage, would you also have to pay PMI (presuming the downpayment is low)?  But I do think you want to factor in how long you plan to stay, because it does impact the risk of value loss.  And of course one of the things we&#039;ve all learned recently is the desirability of an affordable payment -- i.e., comfortably affordable, not the max you can afford!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question. I think your overall point about &#8220;doing the math&#8221; is really the right one &#8230; because if you paid higher points for a lower mortgage, would you also have to pay PMI (presuming the downpayment is low)?  But I do think you want to factor in how long you plan to stay, because it does impact the risk of value loss.  And of course one of the things we&#8217;ve all learned recently is the desirability of an affordable payment &#8212; i.e., comfortably affordable, not the max you can afford!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Meghan</title><link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2009/02/08/real-estate-payment-60-seconds/#comment-63724</link> <dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/?p=4024#comment-63724</guid> <description>Good thoughts, Laurie. What about if you bought down your rate when you got your mortgage and paid points up front?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts, Laurie. What about if you bought down your rate when you got your mortgage and paid points up front?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Laurie Morgan</title><link>http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2009/02/08/real-estate-payment-60-seconds/#comment-63723</link> <dc:creator>Laurie Morgan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:02:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/?p=4024#comment-63723</guid> <description>Wouldn&#039;t you also have to consider how long you intend to hold onto the property?  If it&#039;s a primary residence that you intend to hold for a while, it seems to me that your risk of being upside down at the time you decide to sell is a lot lower -- so it might be a better decision to make a bigger downpayment and take a lower interest rate.  The savings over many years on interest would presumably be substantial.  (In fact, it would be worthwhile to determine how much you&#039;d save both due to the lower rate and lower principal -- might be as much or more than you&#039;d lose by being upside down by a modest percentage.)The other thing is, if you have lower payments, you seem a bit more able to make the payments during a lengthy unemployment, should you be unlucky job-wise down the road.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you also have to consider how long you intend to hold onto the property?  If it&#8217;s a primary residence that you intend to hold for a while, it seems to me that your risk of being upside down at the time you decide to sell is a lot lower &#8212; so it might be a better decision to make a bigger downpayment and take a lower interest rate.  The savings over many years on interest would presumably be substantial.  (In fact, it would be worthwhile to determine how much you&#8217;d save both due to the lower rate and lower principal &#8212; might be as much or more than you&#8217;d lose by being upside down by a modest percentage.)</p><p>The other thing is, if you have lower payments, you seem a bit more able to make the payments during a lengthy unemployment, should you be unlucky job-wise down the road.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 282/286 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.biggerpockets.com @ 2012-02-11 13:55:27 -->
