Bailout Economy Has Roots In Obscure Law

by Rob K. Blake on May 31, 2009

  

Many believe the mortgage and housing crisis which triggered an impending financial system meltdown according to the former Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, would need a Congressional “blank check” to avert disaster. At least, that is what Ben Bernanke and Mr. Paulson told Congress who then gave them the “bailout bill” including the $750 Billion asked for to save us all.

Bailout Economy

After the election of President Obama the bailout economy started by the Bush administration really got rolling. Not only did banks need a bailout, but so did insurance companies, auto makers, and every conceivable industry.

Now we have a growing need for government the likes of which America has never seen. The concept of “moral hazard” (the belief if one removes negative consequences of risky practices, one gets more risky practices) is now completely eliminated from the debate. Fear, or more correctly, the irrational fear of financial system collapse trumped all legitimate arguments. Not only that, but the speed to action we supposedly needed to save ourselves, didn’t leave any time for a debate.

So we had no debate.

Now we have a bailout economy where the financial headlines are dominated by the most recent industry needing (and usually getting) a bailout.

And this all started with a bank system in need of Congressional action in the form of dollars.

What if I told you the banking system already had a system in place in case of an emergency to save itself without Congressional action?

It’s true.

Back in 1991 Senator Dodd introduced and got passed at the behest of Wall Street a single line in a bill that would give the Federal Reserve the ability to make loans to “in danger” institutions to save the system from collapse.

The law sat dormant for 16 years until this law was triggered to assist in this current crisis, but it seems it was not enough. The Fed didn’t want to go it alone, so they roped in the Treasury Department to help out.

Why?

Whether the bailout money comes from the Fed or from Congress, it’s all the same. So why go through all the gyrations of last Fall and this Spring to get new laws passed ostensibly for bailout purposes?

One could speculate, Congressional leaders need to feel important, so this was their “charade of caring” on display. One could say the same of the new President.

One could say, if the Fed jumped in alone and saved the financial system, laying the debt on the taxpayer without any voter recourse, we’d all see first hand just how “out of control” powerful they really are.

The Fed power was on display again by Wednesday this week when mortgage rates rose the fastest I’ve ever seen in 16 years of watching the markets. Then by Friday, after Fed intervention, they dropped just a fast.

Whatever you want to believe, the Fed’s fingerprints are all over the mortgage crisis and now on the bailout.

Let’s just hope we find a way in the aftermath, to curb their power…

Getting rid of Senator Dodd would be a good start.

Until next week….

Related posts:

  1. Bailout Mania! How to Spend Ourselves to Prosperity to Save the Economy (with Fred Thompson)
  2. Are They Serious? Fed Takes Mortgage Debt as Collateral, Bear Stearns Gets Bailout, and President Bush is Confident in the Economy!
  3. Housing Bailout Quotes of the Day. What Real People think of the Bailout.
  4. Massive New Bailout For Real Estate—Or Is It Really For Banks?
  5. The $700 Billion Banking Bailout Bill Passes – Will It Work?
Got questions about this or other real estate topics? Ask on the BiggerPockets Forums.

You May Also Be Interested In...

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Greg Barr June 3, 2009 at 5:12 am

My Brother a Director at suisse credit bank,was tellingme all this 9 months ago.You can be sure of one thing though,the big city banks and insurance companies wont be paying the losses

Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy:

• Use your name and only your name in the field designated for your name.
• No keywords allowed as anchor text in the name or comment fields.
• No signature links allowed under your comments
• You may use links in the body of your comment, but it must be relevant to the discussion at hand, and not merely be some promotional link.
• We will have NO reservations about deleting your content if we feel you are posting merely to get a link without adding value to our discussion.
• If you add value, but still post keywords, we'll use your post, but remove your link and keywords.
• For more information about acceptable practice, see our site rules.

Want your photo to appear next to your comments? Set up your Gravatar today.

Previous post:

Next post:

Copyright © 2004-2012 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
BiggerPockets® is a registered trademark of BiggerPockets, Inc.