HUD Raises Limits on Negative Balances for Real Estate Refinance through HARP

by Steve Heideman on July 7, 2009

  

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development this past week extended the Home Affordable Refinance Program to borrowers who are up to 25 percent upside-down on mortgages guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The previous threshold was 105 percent, or owing 5 percent more than the value of the home.

To qualify for refinancing under the federal government’s Home Affordable Refinance Program, the borrower’s loan must be secured by government-sponsored entities Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. About 20 percent of all “seriously delinquent” homeowners have Fannie or Freddie loans. The best way to find out if your loan is a Fannie or Freddie loan is to ask your lender. If you are a do it yourself type, there is an eligibility database available at: http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov to see if you qualify.  However, I have seen several cases where the database says that the borrower is ineligible when in fact they are—so be cautious about that.

The general guidelines according to HUD are:

  • The home must contain no more than four single-family units. That means certain small multifamily properties can qualify.
  • Mortgage payments must be current, with no late payments more than 30 days past due.
  • The outstanding primary-mortgage loan’s principal must be no more than 125 percent of the home’s current value, up from the previous limit of 105 percent in February.

The question on everyone’s mind is will this work? Will this be enough to stem the tide of foreclosures that continue to deflate real estate prices (real estate is deflating at a slower pace though)

While this will obviously help more homeowners, it will not help to slow the rise in unemployment which, in my opinion is the biggest threat to the economy currently.

What are your thoughts?

Related posts:

  1. It’s The Mortgages, Stupid! Negative Equity Flu Spreads; Whole Town Falls Ill
  2. Commercial Real Estate Investing – The Refinance Nightmare
  3. New Home Sales Up; New Home Sales Down: A Real Estate Economy In Flux Makes Trends Hard To Define
  4. Refinance pitches: Lessons Not Yet Learned
  5. For Real Estate Investors, Finding Good Loans Is Tougher Than Finding Good Deals
Got questions about this or other real estate topics? Ask on the BiggerPockets Forums.

You May Also Be Interested In...

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 LoanSurvivor July 8, 2009 at 7:18 am

I believe the FHFA announced this change, not HUD.

Reply

2 Nick July 9, 2009 at 9:46 pm

If the homeowner already owes more than 5% of what your house is worth, after the refinance points and closing costs, the owner will be even further underwater. Sounds like more negative equity.

Reply

3 JOSE TACORDA July 16, 2009 at 12:08 pm

I WANT TO REFINANCE MY TEN UNIT APARTMENT BLDG AT
SAN JOSE, CA. APPRAISED VALUE IS $1,500,000.00. I WANT TO USE EQUITY TO BUY EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER
AT FRESNO, CA. PRICE IS $6,000,000.00. NET OPERATING INCOME IS $800,100.00. CAN YOU GIVE ME A LOAN FOR THIS SHOPPING CENTER AT 10% DOWN.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy:

• Use your name and only your name in the field designated for your name.
• No keywords allowed as anchor text in the name or comment fields.
• No signature links allowed under your comments
• You may use links in the body of your comment, but it must be relevant to the discussion at hand, and not merely be some promotional link.
• We will have NO reservations about deleting your content if we feel you are posting merely to get a link without adding value to our discussion.
• If you add value, but still post keywords, we'll use your post, but remove your link and keywords.
• For more information about acceptable practice, see our site rules.

Previous post:

Next post:

Copyright © 2004-2012 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
BiggerPockets® is a registered trademark of BiggerPockets, Inc.