First Time Home Owner Tax Credit Likely To Stay; But Current Homeowners Still Face Uncertain Future

by Charles Feldman on October 7, 2009

  

As the, so far, jobless recovery continues, the White House is reportedly hunkered down trying to figure out what to do next. Obama administration officials are taking note of programs that have worked and those that have not done as well.

Among the programs that apparently fall into the “success” column is the $8,000 tax credit for first time home buyers.

The tax credit for first timers was part of the $787 billion dollar stimulus program and is being credited with helping the real estate industry stage a modest comeback—at least among first time home buyers.

All indications are that the tax credits will be continued well into 2010 and maybe beyond. Some legislators have even suggested that the credit amount be increased to help sales in places such as coastal California, where home prices tend to be much higher than in many other parts of the nation.

While helping first time buyers is great, we are still struggling with what to do with current home owners who cannot afford their mortgages and face foreclosure…still a growing problem.

With the unemployment rate expected to only get higher in the months ahead, and with thousands upon thousands of mortgages on the verge of resetting soon at much higher rates, no real recovery in the real estate market is likely until the foreclosure problem is dealt with more effectively than it has been. And, so far, it hasn’t been dealt with effectively at all.

The president still is resisting going to bat for a change in bankruptcy law that would allow judges to adjust mortgages–something he strongly advocated as a candidate.

And, despite some self congratulating newspaper ads, most major banks have been loath to adjust homeowners’ mortgages by any method other than reducing interest while leaving principal alone. Not a good way to go about this, many economists argue.

Helping lots of first timers buy a home while allowing countless current homeowners to be booted from their properties makes little sense…politically or economically.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Related posts:

  1. First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit needs one of those Modifications
  2. The Crisis of Credit Visualized: How We Got Into the Current Housing Mess
  3. 67% Say $8,000 Tax Credit is Likely to Incent them to Buy a Home
  4. Pro-Home Saving Homeowners from Foreclosure
  5. Should Investors Stay Away from Condos
Got questions about this or other real estate topics? Ask on the BiggerPockets Forums.

You May Also Be Interested In...

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Ralph D Bredahl October 7, 2009 at 7:35 am

Throwing money at the problem doesn’t seem to be the answer. I saw a stat today that says 50% of loan mods are once again facing foreclosure.
At least some of the current problem is personal responsibilty
Thanks for a good article

Reply

2 Marlene October 7, 2009 at 9:31 am

The first time buyer program is a great tool to get first time buyers (or at least if you have not owned a home in three years) to get out and buy a home. But does this solve our nation’s crisis-unemployment, foreclosures and failing banks? No, really we need to go back to the American trade act. We need to tax foreign companies that import items to sell in our county and we need to start making our own goods-the only way to turn this country around is to close the trade and start manufacturing HERE in the good ol’ U.S of A. Thnaks for a great article!

Reply

3 Sam Chapman October 7, 2009 at 11:08 am

The housing “recovery” has been artificial. If the credit does not get extended, we will see sales fall. If it extends, we will see more money give away that future generations will have to pay for.

As for loan modifications, I don’t like that idea. Investors buying mortgagge backed securities will want a higher rate of return if they are buying assets that can create a loss. That will lead to higher interest rates.

Reply

4 Steve October 8, 2009 at 10:38 am

I have heard all kinds of reports. The tax credit will be moved to $15,000 seems like the consensus right now.

Agreed, that we still have a large list of bigger problems.
.-= Steve´s last blog ..Scams Polar CMC Inc and Escrow Stream? =-.

Reply

5 Willis Wood October 9, 2009 at 1:07 pm

I hope that the government renews the $8,000 first time buyer tax credit. Even though it is not a permanent solution to our problems, I think it has boosted the real estate sector. However, we are still a long shot from having a thriving economy again. Thanks for the article!

Reply

6 ILR October 20, 2009 at 1:12 pm

I agree that the first time home buyer program works and should be extended.

I also think the way Home Affordable Modification Plan (HAMP) has not been a success and should be changed.

I think more emphasis should be on streamlining Short Sale approvals and Guarantee losses Investors will have to take on some of these toxic mortgages.

Finally back to the first time home buyer. I think FHA needs to be available for first time home buyers and talk about changing the down payment should be avoided at all cost.
.-= ILRealtor´s last blog ..Top 2 Reasons Why A Short Sale Never Closes… and How to Prevent it =-.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy:

• Use your name and only your name in the field designated for your name.
• No keywords allowed as anchor text in the name or comment fields.
• No signature links allowed under your comments
• You may use links in the body of your comment, but it must be relevant to the discussion at hand, and not merely be some promotional link.
• We will have NO reservations about deleting your content if we feel you are posting merely to get a link without adding value to our discussion.
• If you add value, but still post keywords, we'll use your post, but remove your link and keywords.
• For more information about acceptable practice, see our site rules.

Previous post:

Next post:

Copyright © 2004-2012 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
BiggerPockets® is a registered trademark of BiggerPockets, Inc.