Follow Us on Social Media

email icon rss icon linked.in icon google plus icon twitter icon facebook icon

Nevada’s Home Loan Modification Law Ignored

by Richard Warren on October 26, 2009 · 4 comments

  
Post image for Nevada’s Home Loan Modification Law Ignored

What if you had a home modification law that everyone ignored? In its 2009 legislative session the State of Nevada passed a law requiring loan modification companies to be licensed. The law, which recently took effect, not only required a license but the companies were also required to post a $75,000 surety bond. It seemed like a good idea at the time. (article)

At the top of the foreclosure rankings for practically the entire housing crisis, it made perfect sense that it would be a hotbed for loan modification companies. Unfortunately that also lured the scammers. According to the Nevada Attorney General’s office, loan modification scams account for 88% of all housing related fraud cases in the state (article). It was a statistic that ensured that the legislature would act.

The Best Laid Plans

It seems that a funny thing happened on the way to regulation. As usual, the legislature didn’t foresee what might happen when it wrote the law. It’s noNV Fight Fraud surprise that the scam artists would ignore the law as they continued to operate. The new regulations give the government a way to shut these predators down and protect homeowners desperate to save their homes. There’s certainly nothing wrong with that.

But what about legitimate companies that are trying to comply with the law but are finding it difficult to do so? As the licensing deadline approached the state’s mortgage division was processing about 50 applications for loan modification licenses. However, none had posted the required surety bond which means the licenses won’t be approved. Does that mean the end of loan modification companies? Not likely.

What Went Wrong?

To invoke a line from Cool Hand Luke, What we have here is a failure to communicate. It seems that many feel the government did a poor job in relating the new requirements to the industry. The loan modification bond requirements went into effect along with another law that required mortgage brokers to post a similar bond. Many operators of loan modification companies are also mortgage brokers and made the assumption than one bond would be good for both, it isn’t. Many consumer credit counselors are also doing loan modifications and assumed that bonds required for that industry also covered loan modifications, they were wrong as well.

Most small and start-up companies, even if legitimate, are not in a position to put up $75,000 just to do business. That means that they need to purchase a bond from a surety company. Problem number one is finding a company willing to post a bond for a high-risk industry. Problem number two is affording it if they can find one. A surety bond can easily cost 10% or more of the face amount. A lot of companies simply don’t have the money. Many of them will continue to operate and risk running afoul of the law.

It will be interesting to see how the mortgage division handles the issue. For sure there will be some sort of grace period since the regulations weren’t as clear as they could have been. Beyond that it remains to be seen whether they go after all companies who haven’t complied or just those that receive complaints.

Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. – Otto Von Bismark

Photo Credit: Nevada Tumbleweed

Email *
  



{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Dave Sharp October 26, 2009 at 1:24 pm

So, in conclusion, no one is going to plunk down the $75k, and the scammers will continue to run amok.

Reply

Todd Wetzelberger October 26, 2009 at 4:52 pm

This is another example of hasty law making that throws the baby out with the bathwater.

Yes, there are scoundrels preying on the weak and scared but there is much more damage from a government that touts “..don’t pay, walk away…” and guarantees 500,000 homeowners will be modified under HAMP and the reality is 1,700. It has produced dismal results like Hope 4 Homeowners under tail end of Bush.

The private sector, especially those very few who know the fraud lenders perpetrate against the American people are about the only shot most homeowners have at leveling the playing field and not becoming another foreclosure statistic.

There will be approx. 4 million foreclosures this year, approx. 9,500/ day which is about 1 every 9 seconds.

What has the “state” (meaning federal, state and local) government done to really address the problem and provide real lasting solutions to homeowners other than bailing out the lenders who dump millions into campaign funds adn contributions.

Did you catch all the cowards ducking out of the House Oversight committeee to avoid forcing a vote on subpoening Countrywide to get to the bottom of the “friends of Angelo” list of sweetheart loans given to more than 1 politician (Chris Dodd being most prominent) ?

Be careful which Kool Aid you drink and keep a keen eye out for the misinformation and redirection.

It’s the subtle swindle you need to watch out for not the overt.

Reply

Jay October 27, 2009 at 4:03 pm

With all of the scam loan fraud companies out there, I support strict licensing and bonding, however a $70k bond seems quite high.

Reply

Jason November 2, 2009 at 7:16 pm

We had to jump through the hoops, met all the requirements and are now being very successful in completing modifications. However, I can’t seem to get any form of media to listen to our story and report the truth about those of us who are truly doing the right thing. Media only wants to put the work “SCAM” over the entire modification sector of the mortgage industry. Why doesn’t some one bring their questions to the table face to face with us and report their findings? We are willing to put ourselves in the hot seat.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy:

• Use your real name and only your name in the field designated for your name.
• No keywords allowed as anchor text in the name or comment fields.
• No signature links allowed under your comments
• You may use links in the body of your comment, but it must be relevant to the discussion at hand, and not merely be some promotional link.
• We will have NO reservations about deleting your content if we feel you are posting merely to get a link without adding value to our discussion.
If you add value, but still post keywords, we'll use your comment, but remove your link and keywords.
• For more information about acceptable practice, see our site rules.

Want your photo to appear next to your comments? Set up your Gravatar today.

Previous post:

Next post: