Better, Faster, Cheaper

by J Scott on June 9, 2010

  

There’s a popular saying in the technology industry (an industry where I spent much of my career): “Better, Faster, Cheaper — Pick Two“…

Basically, the idea was that you can build something at 1) higher quality, 2) in less time, or 3) for less money — but you can’t do all three of those simultaneously. At best, you could could optimize for two of them, in which case it was generally the third that would suffer.

For example, building a new piece of software — you can build it better and faster, but it will cost more to do so; or you can build it fast and cheap, but the quality will likely suffer.

In my experience, this same principle applies to many aspects of business and life, and is certainly true when it comes to contractors and real estate renovation. While there are some contractors out there who churn out only high-quality work; and there are contractors who are tremendously efficient and always on-schedule; and then there are some very reasonably priced contractors; you won’t normally find a contractor who is all three of these things.

In fact, the “better, faster, cheaper — pick two” principle is very much alive and well when it comes to contractors.

Better, Faster, Cheaper: Applied to Rehab Contractors

With that in mind, it’s important to determine up-front which two of these three aspects of your renovation you are most concerned with, and then expect that you might need to compromise on the third. For example, in my case, I’m unwilling to compromise on quality, and with my margins being relatively small, I’m not willing to risk my budget on most projects. So, if I want to ensure that that I have my contractors focused on quality (better) and price (cheaper), I must be willing to compromise on schedule (faster).

This principle is always utmost in my mind when I’m interviewing and evaluating potential contractors for my jobs. I went through several General Contractors (GC) before finding my current one. I had some that wanted to cut corners, so I fired them within days of them starting. I had some that tried to jack the price up by telling me repairs were needed that I knew weren’t, and I ultimately got rid of those as well.

My current GC has some amazing qualities — he knows construction and building codes in great detail; his workers produce high-quality results; and his prices are tremendously reasonable compared to other similarly-qualified GCs (and he doesn’t tend to find “surprises” that cost me more). But, I’ve found that — because he likely has many projects going on at once — he is not very good at keeping on schedule. Sure, I could probably push him harder to stick to schedules and to meet deadlines, but I’m willing to trade that aspect of my projects knowing that I’m going to hit my budgets and the results will be top-notch.

Again, I’m willing to sacrifice Faster for Better and Cheaper

My suggestion to anyone getting into house flipping or renovation — decide up-front which two of these three things are most important to you, and optimize your contractor selection to those two things. Then be prepared to compromise on the third, as you’re unlikely to find contractors who can deliver all three.

Related posts:

  1. The Critical Path to Faster Success
  2. Commercial Real Estate: The Iceberg is Melting Faster!
  3. How Online Classified Ad Syndication Can Help You Sell Your Properties Faster!
  4. FHA Rules Changing Faster Then I Change My Underwear
Got questions about this or other real estate topics? Ask on the BiggerPockets Forums.

You May Also Be Interested In...

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Jeff Brown June 9, 2010 at 8:37 am

J — I’m racking my brain to come up with a lone exception to that rule, at least one that would matter. Boobka so far.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment Policy:

• Use your name and only your name in the field designated for your name.
• No keywords allowed as anchor text in the name or comment fields.
• No signature links allowed under your comments
• You may use links in the body of your comment, but it must be relevant to the discussion at hand, and not merely be some promotional link.
• We will have NO reservations about deleting your content if we feel you are posting merely to get a link without adding value to our discussion.
• If you add value, but still post keywords, we'll use your post, but remove your link and keywords.
• For more information about acceptable practice, see our site rules.

Previous post:

Next post:

Copyright © 2004-2012 BiggerPockets, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
BiggerPockets® is a registered trademark of BiggerPockets, Inc.