Great. Taxpayers now own banks, investment houses, probably an auto company or two before long, and the British have shown that, despite having lost their empire, they still know a thing or two about handling a financial crisis that the U.S. and others can take lessons from…

But does this mean that people who were on the cusp of being kicked out of their homes are all of a sudden safe –if not sound–once again?

The wolf may not be at the door, but he is still lurking just around the corner, for sure.

We keep being told that these massive government measures are aimed at helping Wall Street as well as Main Street–and, to some degree, this is certainly true.

And yet, we still do not have a firm plan in place that has as its primary purpose the preservation of home owners facing foreclosure. The housing plan passed earlier this year by Congress still hasn’t had much of an impact. And, one can only wonder whether the government buying stakes in troubled banks will actually force them to amend the mortagage terms of their most troubled clients?

If banks are really going to use their new financial lifeline provided by taxpayers to extend a helping hand to home owners, why are they still so vigorously opposed to changing the bankruptcy laws to allow judges to amend mortgage terms to help people stay in their homes? Most experts think that is the best way to ease the housing crisis, so why are they trying to block it at every turn?

One can’t help but wonder whether the big banks will take the money and help themselves while giving the cold boot to the rear ends of cash starved homeowner/clients?

90 days?
Barack Obama is proposing a 90 day hold on any pending foreclosures, but is that really going to help much? Seems a bit like a band-aid being applied to a cancerous mole. But McCain’s notions don’t really seem better. So, on this front, it may just end up being a draw.

What should have Americans really worried, if they are not already, is the lack of political leadership across the board. Neither Obama nor McCain have exactly been ahead of the curve on this one. And, the Bush administration is apparently taking its bailout cues now from the U.K.–talk about Masterpiece Theatre!

The more things change, the more they stay the same?

The other day, I received in the mail an invite of sorts from WAMU–now Chase–telling me how I could, if I qualify, get a nice, cheap mortgage at incredible rates. Odd, isn’t this how we sort of got into this mess allegedly in the first place? I know, the bank will no doubt say that what has changed is that it will now actually try and make sure that it only lends money to those likely to pay back. But, one can’t help but wonder, what with the US government pumping billions into these institutions, whether or not they won’t quickly revert to their past practices? That WAMU letter I got would suggest that is a real possibility.

If it does start getting easier to get credit, then, it would stand to reason, those cheap homes now on sale all over the country should be bought up fairly quickly.

But homes prices are still expected to drop so , even if credit become more available, buyers may still elect to stay on the sidelines waiting…which would only bring home prices down more.

Also, some economists are now predicting–even with this massive bank rescue plan–that U.S. unemployment may rise to more than 8 percent this coming year! Not great news for the housing market, either.

Don’t let the current excitment fool you. We are not out of the woods. Not by a long shot.

Photo Credit: kyz

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or sign up for our real estate social network. Thanks for visiting!

Tags: bailout, banking, banks, Economy, government bailout, mortgage, REO

The snowball that is the US and Global Financial Crisis continued to get larger Tuesday as American International Group (AIG), the nation’s largest insurer came close to collapse. Over the weekend, the Fed failed to provide a $40 Billion bridge loan that the company’s leadership had been pressing for, but late Monday night, the Fed stepped in. In exchange for an 80% ownership stake in the company, the government went against earlier promises and rescued AIG with an $85 Billion loan.

According to CNN:

Officials decided they had to act lest the nation’s largest insurer file bankruptcy. Such a move would roil world markets since AIG (AIG, Fortune 500) has $1.1 trillion in assets and 74 million clients in 130 countries. An eventual liquidation of the company is most likely, senior Fed officials said. But with the government loan, the company won’t have to go through a tumultuous fire sale.

The failure of AIG could have caused unprecedented global ripple effects, said Robert Bolton, managing director at Mendon Capital Advisors Corp. AIG is a major player in the market for credit default swaps, which are insurance-like contracts that guarantee against a company defaulting on its debt. Also, it is a huge provider of life insurance, property and casualty insurance and annuities.

“If AIG fails and can’t make good on its obligations, forget it,” Bolton said. “It’s as big a wave as you’re going to see.” AIG has had a very tough year. Rocked by the subprime crisis, the company has lost more than $18 billion in the past nine months and has seen its stock price fall more than 91% so far this year. It already raised $20 billion in fresh capital earlier this year. Its troubles stem from its sales of credit default swaps and from its subprime mortgage-backed securities holdings.

According to the International Herald Tribune:

The decision, announced by the Fed only two weeks after the Treasury Department took over the quasi-government mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is the most radical intervention in private business in the central bank’s history. With time running out after AIG failed to get a bank loan to avoid bankruptcy, Treasury Secterary Henry Paulson Jr. and the Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke convened a meeting with House and Senate leaders on Capitol Hill at about 6:30 p.m. Tuesday to explain the rescue plan.

The decision was a remarkable turnabout by the Bush administration and Paulson, who had flatly refused over the weekend to risk taxpayer money to prevent the collapse of Lehman Brothers or the distressed sale of Merrill Lynch to Bank of America. Earlier this year, the government bailed out another investment bank, Bear Stearns, by engineering a sale to JPMorgan Chase that left taxpayers on the hook for up to $29 billion of bad investments by Bear Stearns. The government hoped at the time that this unusual step would both calm markets and lead to a recovery by the financial system. But critics warned at the time that it would only encourage others to seek bailouts, and the eventual costs to the government would be staggering.

Was there any other option for the government? What now? Taxpayers now own Fannie, Freddie, and AIG . . . any guesses as to what’s next?

This week’s news has been the financial equivalent of a 9.5 earthquake on the richter scale . . . unprecedented!

Tags: AIG, American Insurance Group, fed, government bailout, paulson