Real Estate News & Commentary

US Home Prices: Don’t Expect a Rebound

Expertise: Mortgages & Creative Financing, Real Estate News & Commentary
24 Articles Written
US Home Prices

Everyone has an opinion about where home prices are heading. Many of them are optimistic, which is exciting – but don’t run out and start throwing money at real estate just yet.   Much of this optimism is based on nothing more than hope.  Rather than think wishfully, let’s explore some data and see what is reasonable for US Home prices.

Want more articles like this?

Create an account today to get BiggerPocket's best blog articles delivered to your inbox

Sign up for free

How NOT to Analyze Data

An often cited measure of US Home Prices is the Case-Shiller Home Price Index. This index tracks how the average home price increases or decreases over time. The absolute number isn’t meaningful, but the change from year to year is.

This chart shows that index from January 2000.

US Home Prices since 2000

I’ve heard some experts take this data and argue something along these lines:

In the chart above, we see that starting in 2007 we had a large drop in home prices and we’re now beginning recover. We can expect a more than 17% increase in home prices in the near future to recoup our losses.

Related: BP Podcast 030: Conservative Real Estate Investing and Starting Out with Kenny Estes

The Purchase Anchor Fallacy

One trap that everyone, including myself, falls into is what I like to call the Purchase Anchor Fallacy. When we purchase something, we create a psychological, and illogical, attachment to that price. When new information challenges this price level, we try and explain it away.

For example: say you buy a stock for $30. The market sells off and the now it’s trading at $25. Do you sell it? Assuming minimal transaction costs, you should keep the stock if you would buy it again at $25. Today’s price is today’s price and your decision should have nothing to do with historical prices.

That said, as humans we tend to bring the $30 purchase price into the picture. We tell ourselves that that the low price is temporary phenomenon and will fix itself before long. No one likes to be wrong.  At some level we think that loss isn’t “real” until we sell it, so if we hold it for another couple of days, the price could come back!


In real estate negotiation have you heard someone say “I need to get my money back out of it” or “that’s less than I bought it for?”  Something is only worth what someone is will pay you for it.  What you paid doesn’t matter.

The US Home Prices index example in the previous section is nothing more than the Purchase Anchor Fallacy being stated explicitly with percentages and a snazzy chart.

Supply and Demand of Return

Rather than using prices with no baseline, I like to start with fundamental economics. What determines home prices?

Supply and demand.

The demand is driven by the population.

The supply is not driven by the number of houses available.

In a specific area, housing supply and demand might set prices.  But in an aggregated index across for all US Home Prices?  Not so much.  At least not in the long run.  Let’s say the housing supply is too low, prices will increase in the short term. Someone like me will notice this and either build or renovate some homes.  These new properties will increase supply and bring home prices back in line.

The demand for RETURN sets US Home Prices.

Say you have some money to invest.  You can put it in real estate, but you’ll demand compensation for your time and energy.  If you think you’ll receive less than that return, you’ll just keep your money in the bank, or the stock market.  It’s this return which sets home prices.  Would you invest in a house house if you get a better yield from your savings account?

How can we measure this?  For a long term investor, their rate of return is determined by rents.  So let’s start there.  Do rental rates track well with home prices?

As luck would have it, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has calculated Owner Equivalent Rent since 1983 (this is not as far back as I would like, but it’s a start).

US Home Prices vs rent

Up until the the beginning of the bubble in the early 2000’s, prices tracked rent very well.

This makes sense.  If you could rent a $1,000,000 home for $100 a month, you’d be silly to buy it.  Renting pushes the rental prices up and home prices down.  If enough people make this trade, prices and rent will fall  in line with “acceptable” returns.

Price to Rent Ratio

Let’s clarify things even further by dividing price by rent:

US Home Prices over rent ratio

Now that's a sexy chart. The previous chart sloped up thank to the "miracle" of inflation. Since both prices and rents are in dollar denominations, when we divide one by the other we take inflation out of the picture and the bubble appears extra bubbly.

Notice anything strange in this chart? Today’s prices are above the norm set in the 1980’s and 1990’s.

Might this imply a further drop in home prices?  Perhaps.  But this ratio changes.

Changing the Ratio for US Home Prices

Our price to rent ratio is an approximation of the return the market demands, which can be affected by a plethora of things.  Here are a few:

Interest Rates. When interest rates are high, money is harder to borrow and there are other high yielding investments competing for dollars. Thus you will demand a higher return on your investment and the price/rent ratio should drop. The opposite is also true.  That’s the theory at least.  Over our timeline, it’s difficult to notice much impact:


Regulation. The idea is similar to interest rates, but more direct. If gobs of red tape forces you to invest more time and money into owning real estate, the ratio will drop.

Property Taxes. If Uncle Sam is taking more money out of your pocket, you will need a lower price to yield the same return, hence lower ratio.  Again, the opposite is true.

Wrap It Up: US Home Prices Aren’t Going to Rebound

US Home Prices are determined by supply and demand (as are most things).  Demand is driven by the population.  Supply, by returns.

Short term supply might be determined by the number of houses available, but it doesn’t take long to build a new home.  Rather, home scarcity is determined by how much return investors demand.  We approximated the demanded return using the price/rent ratio and found that home prices are either where they should be or a bit high.

Will the US Home Prices rise in the future?  Yes.  So will the price of sandals.  They’ll gradually increase thanks to inflation, not to “recover our losses.”

Do you agree or disagree? Share your comments below.

Photo: Bob_2006

During Kenny's decade in finance he bought many single family rentals in rural areas, as a hobby. Along the way, he talked some brave souls into joining him as investors and recently retired from finance to take his hobby to the next level. Find more by and about Kenny on his personal blog and his recently created twitter account!
    Mark Ferguson
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Excellent article! I love all the charts. I agree with your points, but I would love to know one more piece of data. What is the total amount of single family homes versus the total population? I ask this because of a local trend I am seeing. Our average price is $170k approximately. The lowest priced new construction home is $179,900 in our entire county. Most of our demand is in the lower priced home, under $150,000. The builders cannot build cheap enough to meet the low priced demand due to cost to build. We definitely have a shortage of inventory right now. I think that is because the market was depending on REO inventory the last 7 years. There was almost no building during that time. Now that REO is down, there aren’t enough homes as our population continues to rise. Bringing this all together, I am guessing we have less single family homes now compared to total population now because of the REO cycle we were just in. That has produced a shortage of inventory now that REO is down, which you talked about. you mentioned the builders could catch up quickly to meet demand, but what if they can’t build cheap enough to meet the lower end demand? Does that make lower end prices increase and therefore push everything up? Or am I in an isolated area and most of the country can build cheap enough to meet the lower end?
    Kenny Estes
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Hey Mark, Thanks for the comment. I actually spent about 30 minutes trying to cobble together good quarterly population data (which was the scale for the rest of my data). The only “good” data point is from the census every 10 years and then they make annual guesses in between. Quarterly isn’t useful. I can’t speak to your particular area, but I do know material prices are very expensive thanks to Hurricane Sandy. I don’t like speculating without some data, but I would guess as the eastern seaboard renovations complete material prices will drop, or at least remain steady until demand catches up. Then we’ll see a slew of new construction. Until then we’ll see more rental demand and a slightly elevated home prices. My charts above at least loosely imply home prices are too high today. It very well could be abnormally high material prices pushing them there. Cheers, Kenny
    Karen Rittenhouse
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Yes, I agree – over time, the price of everything will increase (which is why I’m stocking up on sandals as quickly as I can). Love your phrase, The Purchase Anchor Fallacy. Laughed out loud. I will be using that one. I always tell buyers, “When calculating price, it doesn’t matter how much the seller wants for their property. All that matters is how much you’re willing to pay.” Thanks for your post!
    Kenny Estes
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Thanks for the comment Karen. Cheers, Kenny
    Geof Greeneisen
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Great Article! Very useful information and analysis of the information. One additional concern I have as it relates to new construction price point is lot cost. Entry level pricing starts at $179,900 in our area as well, however these houses are being constructed on lots that went through the foreclosure process and became REO. Builders have been to pick up lots previously developed and sold at $60,000 for $5,000 – $10,000. Once these cheap lots are absorbed (which I’m estimating in our area to be a 3 year supply), and builders/developers again begin buying land for development of new lots, I think we will see a substantial increase in new construction pricing. The costs associated with land development have skyrocketed in the past 7 years. The biggest proponent of this is the cost of oil. Mass grading, infrastructure installation and the cost of asphalt (petroleum based) all have gone up. In our area gas has increased 50% since 2007. I think we’ll see another dramatic jump in pricing for new construction once true lot costs are factored into the equation. This coupled with a rise in interest rates could again stall new construction and pull current housing values up. Loved the Purchase Anchor Fallacy! Thanks for the article.
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Increasing prices due to inflation seems to support the theory of purchasing product with fixed rate debt. The value of your debt continues to decline while your product does not. Jason
    Kenny Estes
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Hey Jason, I agree that you fixed rate debt is a nice to have. Don’t forget to compare the overall returns of that approach with price increases, which might outweigh the gain. Cheers, Kenny
    Travis Daggett
    Replied over 7 years ago
    I agree, Kenny! Good analysis. The fundamentals that could drive prices higher in the long run are noticeably absent, namely employment and income. Since unemployment is high and incomes are low, it’s hard for prices of homes to rise for an extended period of time.
    Kenny Estes
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Good point Travis! At least to me that would imply home prices are too high at the moment and might correct. Interestingly, if you look at home prices historically there is only a loose correlation with “fundamentals” like income levels or unemployment. I’ll try and get another article out looking at it in more depth. Cheers, Kenny Reply Report comment
    Kenny Estes
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Good point Travis! At least to me that would imply home prices are too high at the moment and might correct. Interestingly, if you look at home prices historically there is only a loose correlation with “fundamentals” like income levels or unemployment. I’ll try and get another article out looking at it in more depth. Cheers, Kenny
    Replied over 7 years ago
    Kenny, Great post! I’m a sucker for nice charts. It really gives me something to delve into. But I also like square away investing with core fundamentals. I go to people like Warren Buffett for fundamental concepts. “If you aren’t willing to own a stock for ten years, don’t even think about owning it for ten minutes.” — Warren Buffet[1] I once bought a stock position, and it seemed like the next day, it’s price dropped over 10%. I had to wait over a year for it to recover. But now, two years later, it’s up-up-up. We can talk about QE, and all kinds of junk. But bottom line: I didn’t buy that stock for price appreciation in the first place. Instead I bought it for it’s 25 year history of growing dividends. Same thing for real estate. Price is important, but I look more closely at quality and the rent I can gather. Over time, the accumulation of rent will probably outweigh price appreciation.[2] It puts me in a position to take advantage of the next bubble, which our government may wish to avoid but will invariable cause to happen. 🙂