Depreciation Basis for Condo Bought With Vacant Land 1031
We purchased vacant land in the 1970's for $70,000. Sold it in 2018 for $720,000 and 1031 exchanged for 3 condos now used as rentals.
Since the sold property was vacant and never depreciated - what is the cost basis and depreciation schedule for the new condos?
Should it be as in a new purchase i.e. dwelling deprecated over 27.5 years?
Or - some formula based on the vacant land purchase & sale prices?
What is entailed in "opting out" using IRS Form 4562? Would that come into play here?
My only understanding of that is from a memo I found on line written by Realty Exchange Corporation.
Many, MANY thanks

I would strongly suggest utilizing a tax pro to report this 1031 especially since the sale allocates into 3 new assets.
Your carryover basis in the condos is going to be the $70,000 split between the 3 new assets.
So assuming they're all identical $23,333 each apx
THEN if the condo has some value allocated to land say 15%
You need to reduce that $23k by 15% because land value won't be depreciable.
Your depreciable basis in the condos could be higher if there was debt assumed as well.

Thank you both - My tax preparer has not inspired great confidence, so when he said exactly what you outlined I was skeptical. I also asked him to have an actual conversation with our 1031 intermediary rather than emails subject to assumptions and misinterpretations.
If I can't get the free lunch, at least I can minimize and defer!
John

@John Haelig
Filing a tax return with a 1031 exchange is complicated and not something to be done by yourself or an accountant who is not familiar with 1031 exchanges.
I would ask your accountant how often he deals with clients who have done 1031's.
If he is not giving you confidence still, you may want to consider reaching to a new accountant.
Yeah, as said....it’s your basis from the old property, $70k, plus whatever additional cash or mtg you took to cover the purchase ($70k plus whatever amount the price for the three condos was above $720k, less selling costs).