Hey BP, what is the general consensus on paying or opting out of "Owner's Title Insurance" as part of closing costs? In MN it appears to be an optional expense. Is it really necessary and/or worth the cost (which is $873 in this particular case)? Feels like it could be one of those things that just lines the pockets of the mortgage company, however, I also don't want to be overly pessimistic.
I do understand that the "Lender's Title Insurance" is required.
Any advice would be appreciated.
The lender's policy protects the lender and the lender gets nothing out of the owner's policy, financially or otherwise. The OTP only protects the purchaser against certain defects and encumbrances to title.
Personally, eliminating a title policy for such a small price is like stepping over a dollar to save a dime.
The mortgage co. makes nothing off of the title insurance. The title agent/issuing attorney does. I'd buy it. 10-20 years from now when you have a ton of equity, would you want it to be at risk?
I'm on the side of taking it, too. As others have pointed out, lender's title insurance insures the lender, and only the lender. As the owner, I would like to be insured too. I have never had a need to 'use' title insurance, but I want it to be there in case I ever do need it!
Free eBook from BiggerPockets!
Join BiggerPockets and get The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Real Estate Investing for FREE - read by more than 100,000 people - AND get exclusive real estate investing tips, tricks and techniques delivered straight to your inbox twice weekly!
- Actionable advice for getting started,
- Discover the 10 Most Lucrative Real Estate Niches,
- Learn how to get started with or without money,
- Explore Real-Life Strategies for Building Wealth,
- And a LOT more.
Sign up below to download the eBook for FREE today!
We hate spam just as much as you
Create Lasting Wealth Through Real Estate
Join the millions of people achieving financial freedom through the power of real estate investing