I follow numerous financial independence blogs. One of them talked about generating 100k a year in income through the landlord real estate route. The post showed that investing with 25% and leveraging was quicker to 100k in income than saving and paying in cash for each house.
So my question is, what if you pay 5% down on multiple houses instead of doing 25% down on one? Has anyone ever done the math to see if you could get there quicker by simply paying 5% down (doing a refi down the line) on multiple homes vs 25% down on one? If it hasn't been done yet, I plan to make a mock up, but figured I'd ask to save myself the headache. Theoretically, I would imagine that the ability to purcahse more than one home at 5% down could stack up enough to have you coming ahead vs 25% down on one house.
I curently have enough for 25% down on a 120-150k home. I will have enough by the end of the year to afford two of these. I'm currently overseas, and plan on making a purcahse the next time I come back to the states (at the end of the year). So this is just food for thought so I can make a wise decision.
5% down loans are for owner occupant loans only, so you could only do one this way.
Wow, I knew that and it didn't even cross my mind when I thought about this haha. Definitely not going the FHA route.
Free eBook from BiggerPockets!
Join BiggerPockets and get The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Real Estate Investing for FREE - read by more than 100,000 people - AND get exclusive real estate investing tips, tricks and techniques delivered straight to your inbox twice weekly!
- Actionable advice for getting started,
- Discover the 10 Most Lucrative Real Estate Niches,
- Learn how to get started with or without money,
- Explore Real-Life Strategies for Building Wealth,
- And a LOT more.
Sign up below to download the eBook for FREE today!
We hate spam just as much as you
Create Lasting Wealth Through Real Estate
Join the millions of people achieving financial freedom through the power of real estate investing