Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$39.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
First-Time Home Buyer
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts

Duplex that does not cashflows still good for first home?

Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Posted

Hi,

As a first time home buyer, I want to learn and experience real estate so I would like to buy a duplex to gain experience as a landlord and get familiar with the processes. I found that most of recommendations to buy a duplex emphasis on positive cashflow or match with simple 1% rule to start with. However, the place I am looking for to stay with my family is north Austin suburb and none of the duplex has a cashflow even if I put 20% down. For example, there are 500k-600k 2000sqt+ duplex that has monthly cost around $4000 ~ 4500 without management but the typical rent in that area for those units is under $2000. So it does not cover even $4000. 

In this type of scenario, is it still worth buying the duplex with one unit owner occupied? Or it is just a bad decision to start investment this way. Let's assume this location has more than average appreciation but not very promising of big jump.

User Stats

2,769
Posts
1,882
Votes
Charles Carillo
  • Rental Property Investor
  • North Palm Beach, FL
1,882
Votes |
2,769
Posts
Charles Carillo
  • Rental Property Investor
  • North Palm Beach, FL
Replied

@Jaekwan Lee

When I have house hacked, the properties have never cashflowed (with me living there). I know people say that, and it is ideal, but it is difficult, especially in growing markets. My goal when I house hacked was to lower my monthly payments. I would want the property to cashflow if it were 100% rented, which sounds like it is still a stretch. If you are going to live there for several years, you might see some rent growth that can assist your bottom line, but I might keep looking.

User Stats

15
Posts
6
Votes
Dale Line
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent and Investor
  • Palm Springs CA and New York, NY
6
Votes |
15
Posts
Dale Line
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent and Investor
  • Palm Springs CA and New York, NY
Replied

It absolutely can be. House Hacking is generally the one situation when purchasing an investment property can be done without positive cash flow. The rationale being you are reducing your personal housing costs as the rented unit will be covering some of the costs. 

I did it with my first home purchase on a 2-family. Ended up living in my unit for about 25% of the price I was getting in market rent for the other unit, even though it didn't have positive cash flow.

Couple things to consider:

1. Make sure you are, in fact, spending less on a monthly basis than if you were buying/renting an equivalent personal property. It may not make sense for your personal finances if over invest and end up with a house hack option that costs more money than somewhere you could live on your own.

2. Run some estimates now on potential future earnings if, at some point, you didn't live in the house and instead it was used as 100% rental. It should have positive cash flow in that future scenario. 
 

BiggerPockets logo
PassivePockets is here!
|
BiggerPockets
Find sponsors, evaluate deals, and learn how to invest with confidence.

User Stats

17,204
Posts
29,664
Votes
Russell Brazil
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
29,664
Votes |
17,204
Posts
Russell Brazil
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?

User Stats

621
Posts
347
Votes
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
347
Votes |
621
Posts
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

Hi @Jaekwan it can. Especially, in some areas of the country were appreciation is high. The 1% rule isn't law and came into existence after the housing crisis but now is harder to find- https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

Attend local meetups to find out what the market is doing on a local level. That will help break down that market and give direct insight on deals there. Best of luck! 

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Sarita Scherpereel:

Hi @Jaekwan it can. Especially, in some areas of the country were appreciation is high. The 1% rule isn't law and came into existence after the housing crisis but now is harder to find- https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

Attend local meetups to find out what the market is doing on a local level. That will help break down that market and give direct insight on deals there. Best of luck! 


Thanks. This would explain why it is hard to find a property under 1% rule.

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Dale Line:

It absolutely can be. House Hacking is generally the one situation when purchasing an investment property can be done without positive cash flow. The rationale being you are reducing your personal housing costs as the rented unit will be covering some of the costs. 

I did it with my first home purchase on a 2-family. Ended up living in my unit for about 25% of the price I was getting in market rent for the other unit, even though it didn't have positive cash flow.

Couple things to consider:

1. Make sure you are, in fact, spending less on a monthly basis than if you were buying/renting an equivalent personal property. It may not make sense for your personal finances if over invest and end up with a house hack option that costs more money than somewhere you could live on your own.

2. Run some estimates now on potential future earnings if, at some point, you didn't live in the house and instead it was used as 100% rental. It should have positive cash flow in that future scenario. 
 

Your case made sense because it is just 25% of the price for your unit. The properties I see the price near my area is around or above 100% of unit price (half the mortgage + @) so I don't see a reason to start with duplex. 

User Stats

17,204
Posts
29,664
Votes
Russell Brazil
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
29,664
Votes |
17,204
Posts
Russell Brazil
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 


 So let's look at the options.

Option A: Pay Rent $3,000 a month. You help your landlord grow rich. 

Option B: Buy Duplex. Cost $4,000 a month. Tenant pays $2,000 of that, and you pay $2,000. 

Option B allows you to save an extra $12,000 s month (minus maintenance costs) and build equity. Rents will continue to rise over time as well. Your tenant helps you grow rich instead of you helping your landlord grow rich.

Option B seems like a no brainer to me.

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
4
Votes |
23
Posts
Jaekwan Lee
Pro Member
Replied
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 


 So let's look at the options.

Option A: Pay Rent $3,000 a month. You help your landlord grow rich. 

Option B: Buy Duplex. Cost $4,000 a month. Tenant pays $2,000 of that, and you pay $2,000. 

Option B allows you to save an extra $12,000 s month (minus maintenance costs) and build equity. Rents will continue to rise over time as well. Your tenant helps you grow rich instead of you helping your landlord grow rich.

Option B seems like a no brainer to me.


 I meant Option A would be buying a single home with $2500-$3000 mortgage payment and possibly use 'live and fix' to increase the house value. 

User Stats

17,204
Posts
29,664
Votes
Russell Brazil
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
29,664
Votes |
17,204
Posts
Russell Brazil
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 


 So let's look at the options.

Option A: Pay Rent $3,000 a month. You help your landlord grow rich. 

Option B: Buy Duplex. Cost $4,000 a month. Tenant pays $2,000 of that, and you pay $2,000. 

Option B allows you to save an extra $12,000 s month (minus maintenance costs) and build equity. Rents will continue to rise over time as well. Your tenant helps you grow rich instead of you helping your landlord grow rich.

Option B seems like a no brainer to me.


 I meant Option A would be buying a single home with $2500-$3000 mortgage payment and possibly use 'live and fix' to increase the house value. 


 Option B still seems like a no brainer to me

User Stats

79
Posts
42
Votes
Joehn B.
  • Investor
  • Houston
42
Votes |
79
Posts
Joehn B.
  • Investor
  • Houston
Replied

Look at fourplexes.

I think we now have Fannie loans (in addition to FHA) that cover owner occupied multi-family!

it still won't cashflow but you might live in one unit for 1,600 and the tenants pay for the rest of the building.  Scale up!

User Stats

15
Posts
6
Votes
Dale Line
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent and Investor
  • Palm Springs CA and New York, NY
6
Votes |
15
Posts
Dale Line
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent and Investor
  • Palm Springs CA and New York, NY
Replied
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Dale Line:

It absolutely can be. House Hacking is generally the one situation when purchasing an investment property can be done without positive cash flow. The rationale being you are reducing your personal housing costs as the rented unit will be covering some of the costs. 

I did it with my first home purchase on a 2-family. Ended up living in my unit for about 25% of the price I was getting in market rent for the other unit, even though it didn't have positive cash flow.

Couple things to consider:

1. Make sure you are, in fact, spending less on a monthly basis than if you were buying/renting an equivalent personal property. It may not make sense for your personal finances if over invest and end up with a house hack option that costs more money than somewhere you could live on your own.

2. Run some estimates now on potential future earnings if, at some point, you didn't live in the house and instead it was used as 100% rental. It should have positive cash flow in that future scenario. 
 

Your case made sense because it is just 25% of the price for your unit. The properties I see the price near my area is around or above 100% of unit price (half the mortgage + @) so I don't see a reason to start with duplex. 
Yes - the economics are different and living in a 2-family isn't for everyone. Something to keep in mind is that if you were living in 1/2 of a rental property 50% of the building maintenance will be tax-deductible (this is because 50% of the building will be investment property). Living in a single family home that you will eventually turn in a rental won't give you that same benefit while you're living there. Sounds like you're doing a great job crunching the numbers. Keep us posted on what you do! 
BiggerPockets logo
BiggerPockets
|
Sponsored
Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

User Stats

621
Posts
347
Votes
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
347
Votes |
621
Posts
Sarita Scherpereel
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Replied
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Sarita Scherpereel:

Hi @Jaekwan it can. Especially, in some areas of the country were appreciation is high. The 1% rule isn't law and came into existence after the housing crisis but now is harder to find- https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/1-percent-rule-dead

Attend local meetups to find out what the market is doing on a local level. That will help break down that market and give direct insight on deals there. Best of luck! 


Thanks. This would explain why it is hard to find a property under 1% rule.


 Right! Even experts on BP say it's harder in a lot of markets. So you're not alone. It just means people are leaning on appreciation much more. 

Listen to your LOCAL experts! People on the ground in your market should be able to give you better market advice. 

User Stats

2,718
Posts
2,723
Votes
V.G Jason
Pro Member
#3 General Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Investor
2,723
Votes |
2,718
Posts
V.G Jason
Pro Member
#3 General Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Investor
Replied
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Quote from @Jaekwan Lee:
Quote from @Russell Brazil:

Is your other option to live in a house and not househack that will cost you $4,000 a month?


I could go a single home that could cost me $2500-$3000 a month. 


 So let's look at the options.

Option A: Pay Rent $3,000 a month. You help your landlord grow rich. 

Option B: Buy Duplex. Cost $4,000 a month. Tenant pays $2,000 of that, and you pay $2,000. 

Option B allows you to save an extra $12,000 s month (minus maintenance costs) and build equity. Rents will continue to rise over time as well. Your tenant helps you grow rich instead of you helping your landlord grow rich.

Option B seems like a no brainer to me.


 I meant Option A would be buying a single home with $2500-$3000 mortgage payment and possibly use 'live and fix' to increase the house value. 


Where in Austin are you going to do that? Far, far east don't think you can even do that. Take into account with Option B that your rents are actually getting hammered this year probably through 2026-2027 given austin's development. Past that, this is the city to be in. So long term, in my opinion, I always take higher quality location SFH over multifamily house hacking but if the latter is the most and easiest access point into REI then definitely roll the dice.

User Stats

7,884
Posts
3,389
Votes
Basit Siddiqi
Pro Member
#3 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Accountant
  • New York, NY
3,389
Votes |
7,884
Posts
Basit Siddiqi
Pro Member
#3 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Accountant
  • New York, NY
Replied

First - You will have other expenses ontop of your mortgage payment. One of which you mentioned, PM Fees, but it will also have other expenses such as repairs, improvements, utilities, etc.

Therefore, your cash-flow will be several percentage points in the negative.

Should you invest?
Real estate provides you a return in one of two ways, cash flow and appreciation.
Cash-flow is negative
Do you project your appreciation to be positive?
Historically, real estate appreciates 3% - 4% annually.
It may be possible, that an area like Austin will appreciate more.
Austin, TX, from my understanding had many years of crazy appreciation and recent years of negative appreciation.

There are also a lot of reports that Austin, TX has a lot of new rental supply that came and is coming into the market.

What is your required return from an investment?