My wife and I have our primary residence and a rental property in the same neighborhood. Our HOA Board is trying to implement a 20% Rental Cap. However, they will need 67% of the lots to be in favor for it to pass.
The board is stating that low number rentals are more advantageous for prospective purchases from the bank and Mortgage Company's point of view. Furthermore, mortgage lenders frequently ask the property management company for our association for information regarding the number of rental units in the community as it may possibly impact their willingness to extend financing to someone purchasing a home.
This seems inaccurate and contrary to what I have heard from local lenders. Feedback is much appreciated!
It is quite common for HOA's to have a cap on the number of rentals and other similar (annoying) restrictions. I am not sure how it is enforced though. You would think that since you ALREADY have a rental in the neighborhood, they won't force you to convert/sell.
But who knows. I've heard some scary HOA stories!
As far as their reasoning, it is basically the theory that homeowners will take better care of their properties, thus keeping values stable/rising.
FHA backed mortgages do have rental number restrictions for properties within HOAs. Currently that number is 51% rentals and can go as high as 65% rentals if the HOA otherwise meets other criteria.
When discussing this with your neighbors, make sure they understand that, in a down economy, rental units generally have fewer foreclosures and statistically they are the ones that continue to pay dues when others are defaulting. Essentially, the successful rental units keep a community afloat.
If there is a vacant position on the board, you should consider running for it so that the investors in your community have a voice and representation if they do not already have that. You may need to actively campaign against this change in your community with letters, phone calls and door knocking (all at your own expense, of course) to ensure that property rights remain free.
My current rental property will be fine since we're still below the 20% cap that they're trying to pass. I had an issue with their justification of passing the amendment. Thanks, Kyle.
This is a house, Colleen. Great point about limitations. I will bring this up at our Annual Meeting next month prior to us voting for this CAP. Thanks!
Thank you, Linda!
Your podcast came at an appropriate time for me. I was against running for an open position until last week. Now I'm starting to think it may be worth the time and effort, maybe!
you will need to inform other owners that this limits their usage, limits their potential buyer pool if they ever want to sell, and can lower their property value.
also, get firm numbers about the % of rentals that worry a bank. I believe its not an issue until its over 51% rentals. if you can prove to homeowners that there is no reason to fear becoming non warrantable, they may vote in your favor.
my suggestion is get together with other landlords in your community and work together.
Free eBook from BiggerPockets!
Join BiggerPockets and get The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Real Estate Investing for FREE - read by more than 100,000 people - AND get exclusive real estate investing tips, tricks and techniques delivered straight to your inbox twice weekly!
- Actionable advice for getting started,
- Discover the 10 Most Lucrative Real Estate Niches,
- Learn how to get started with or without money,
- Explore Real-Life Strategies for Building Wealth,
- And a LOT more.
Sign up below to download the eBook for FREE today!
We hate spam just as much as you
Create Lasting Wealth Through Real Estate
Join the millions of people achieving financial freedom through the power of real estate investing