Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: David C.

David C. has started 8 posts and replied 116 times.

Post: Thoughts About New Western?

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61

I lent money to a flipper that bought from them.  The deal worked out okay but the agent my borrower worked with wouldn't release the keys, even after escrow closed, until his commission hit his bank account, that among other small issues.  Low class outfit ...

Post: Harris and Trump's Housing Plans from Last Night's Debate

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Kristin Flores-Brockman:

If Harris gets elected and implements this $25k for FTHB, guess what that will do to the price of the homes.....? increase them by $25k. People forget, there are implications when you give things away for free. Ultimately, someone will be paying for it. NOTHING is for free, someone ultimately pays for it.


 I second that.

I remember back in 2008 time frame having a hard time selling a SFR here in SoCal. Obama's FTHB came along and it sold in short order, full price. I always felt it was due to the bump in demand created by the tax credit. Who paid for my windfall, not sure, increased national debt perhaps.

Post: Creating an LLC (I think I did it wrong) Please Help!

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Joe Homs:

@David C. when I started protecting my assets over 10 years ago Statutory Trusts were not around. They are newer and probably the way to go if you own property in California. I use a Wyoming LLC as the trustee of all my entities (privacy protection.)


If you get a loan, isn't your privacy blown when you sign the deed of trust? ... Presumably as manager of the LLC that is trustee of the land trust.

Post: Creating an LLC (I think I did it wrong) Please Help!

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Joe Homs:
Quote from @Ricky Lin:
Quote from @Joe Homs:

@Maurice Stewart this is 2024 and there are not many secrets anymore. I understand what you are trying to accomplish, but you are going about it the wrong way. It's very easy for those "prying eyes" to see your transfer from the original title to the LLC (in California?) which is NOT a very private state. If you have already completed the process, it's not the end of the world and you can live with it like that. California does charge an $800 fee for the LLC and if it's NOT disregarded to you then you must file a tax return (more money.)

If you are concerned about privacy then you should have created a land trust and make your out of State LLC the beneficiary of that trust. The owner of the out of State should be your personal living trust. This would avoid that $800 fee.

As always best to contact a trust attorney and tax advisor for your specific situation.

Good Investing...


 Hi Joe,

Is setting up a land trust and make the out of state LLC the beneficiary pretty easy to do or is an attorney needed? I'm also in California and would like to set up a LLC but want to avoid the $800 fee per year. Do you have an attorney that you can recommend?

Thanks in advance!


 You will need an attorney.   I use Anderson Business Advisors, but you can check around.


 Joe,

Do you use a Statutory trust to get asset protection or a simple land trust?

Also, without saying exactly, who do you use as trustee ... Anderson, a trusted individual, your corp/llc?

Post: WY statutory trust for exemption of CA franchise tax

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61

@Tina Lee

The reason you can't find a box to check on form 590 is because you are not a California resident. Withholding would be required even if there was no trust or LLC involved. Withholding is not for the $800 FTB fee, it's for non-resident income. If title was held in your personal name this would still be happening. Take a look at the instructions for completing form 590, this will give you more insight.

California wants to make sure you pay taxes on income generated in CA. They know you likely wouldn’t file a CA tax return - since you live out of state - so they found a way to make sure you do.

Since you are losing money, most likely you can deduct losses against income and get the withholding back when you file a CA tax return in April.

Confirm this with your tax person.

Post: Quickbooks Online … Class vs Customer

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61

The QBO class tracking feature, found in the more expensive Plus and Advanced versions, is used by many investors. I’m wondering if using Customer instead of Class would work, thereby allowing the less expensive Simple Start or Essentials versions to be used.

As a private lender I’ve been using Customer for borrower and Job for each borrower loan … seems to work. I’m able to get a P&L by borrower/loan, among other reports. Perhaps a property investor could use Customer for each property.

I’m sure there are many QBO aficionados out there that have thought about this, what do you think?

Post: California Flippers: What do you think of AB968 (starting 7/1/2024)?

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61
Quote from @Anthony Sumbry:

Hey David,

To be honest, this bill just hit my radar on Thursday. As an agent and real estate investor, I’m surprised that more people haven’t been talking about this. This will definitely change the game for flippers who aren’t currently using licensed contractors to do the work. Although AB-968 doesn’t specifically mention “licensed” contractors, the state of California already stipulates that “anyone who contracts to perform work that is valued at $500 or more in combined labor and materials costs must hold a current, valid license from CSLB” (source: CSLB).

With AB-968, if work is performed by an (un)licensed contractor in an amount that exceeds $500, disclosing that entity’s or individual’s name and contact information becomes a legal requirement. Assuming that the contractor does not hold a license, the seller would be effectively unveiling potentially illegal activity to the buyer, along with names and contact information. I can see lawyers having a field day with this. As a matter of fact, if you research the term “AB-968” in Google, you’ll see a sea of blog posts by law firms. I don’t think this is a coincidence.

As agents and investors, we really need to take note of this new change. I’ll also be advising all of my investor clients accordingly. I spent the weekend researching and posting a blog about it myself: Fixing Up A House for Sale in CA Requires New Disclosures.

I’m curious about your thoughts. Am I overanalyzing things, or do you also see what I’m seeing?

Good points @Anthony

I think it will have a significant effect, for the better.

As a private lender for years, I've seen many flippers use unlicensed workers and fail to pull permits. As a matter of fact, I had a discussion with a flipper a few weeks ago that brought this new reg to my attention, he was considering getting out of the business realizing that now he would have to comply, and that it would substantially hurt his bottom line.

For me, as a conservative leader, I see it as a positive. Rarely do I lend rehab money, 1st position purchase money only. Why, because of the extra work on my part to administer the hold backs, draws, inspections, etc.

Now I can offer rehab money if they are willing to accept a third-party funds control company. I could always do this but now there is an additional incentive … compliance with AB-968. This would reduce the chances of overrunning their budget, verify work before the next draw and verify permits. Good for me, the flipper and the buyer. That’s my thought, we’ll see how it works out.

Quote from @Joyce Kim:

I've reached out to the office about 2 hours ago, but no one answered the phone. I left my number but haven't received a call back yet. I guess I have to wait till they call me back. 

So far, I've received quotes ranging from $3k to $5k plus an hourly rate for court appearances. I'm willing to pay for the service as I urgently need an attorney's help, but it seems like lawyers are not taking new cases easily. They keep charging me for consultations without taking the case. 😭

Do you have an estimate of their charges for this type of case and whether they are affordable? If exact figures aren't available, could you let me know if they charge a fixed fee per case, hourly, or per court appearance?

Thank you!


Sorry to hear about your difficulties.

I'm in their concierge service so get in a little faster.

Not sure what affordable is since every case is different.  From a cost perspective imo it's most cost efficient to find somebody with a lot of evection experience in your area.

You might try Stelnick Law in Valencia .  They did a good job for us in a difficult eviction.  They practice in los angeles even though they are in Valencia.

I've used Dennis Block for years, has always done a good job for me.  

Post: Exempt from AB 1482 Rent control in Los Angeles

David C.Posted
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 118
  • Votes 61

AB1482 says:
“This property is not subject to the rent limits imposed by Section 1947.12 of the Civil Code and is not subject to the just cause requirements of Section 1946.2 of the Civil Code. This property meets the requirements of Sections 1947.12 (d)(5) and 1946.2 (e)(8) of the Civil Code and the owner is not any of the following: (1) a real estate investment trust, as defined by Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) a corporation; or (3) a limited liability company in which at least one member is a corporation.”

I'm not a trust expert but I'm pretty sure a land trust is not a real estate investment trust (REIT), and I'm assuming your LLC is not owned by a corporation ... therefore it's exempt.