Skip to content
Home Blog News & Trends

I Just Invested In Twitter, Facebook, And Snap—And I Absolutely Hated It!

Philip Michael
3 min read
I Just Invested In Twitter, Facebook, And Snap—And I Absolutely Hated It!

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: I do not like stocks. I really don’t. Granted, for a new investor, it’s a great, free way to get in the asset column with very little money. 

And there are many public securities — especially real estate-backed ones — that help you build wealth. But on a macro level, I absolutely hate it.

So, a few weeks ago, the stock market tanked — based on trade tension speculation (or something). I was looking at the Robinhood dashboard, which shows how the stocks are trending. Everything was red! And you know what they say, when there’s blood in the streets, you buy — right? 

IMG 2074 1

So I picked up a couple of common-sense stocks based on what people are using; Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, you know, the tech bluechippers. Then some Blackberry ones based on driverless technology they have, and a VR/AI stock with a big market share. Gotta invest in the future, right?

Long story short, the very next trading day I was up 10 percent. I kept looking every day, more and more disgusted with the volatile nature of these equities — in spite of how I was winning! Less than three weeks later, I am now up a ridiculously disgusting 630 percent annualized.

And as of today, stocks dropped again. Just based on some speculation about oil. (Or something.) So I’m probably about to make another score when it inevitably restabilizes. And it’s absolutely filthy.

Related: Should You Put Your Money into Stocks or Real Estate?

Here’s My Problem With Stocks…

Like many business owners, I hate surprises. I don’t even want anyone to throw me a surprise party. And stocks are full of surprises.

I actually did an interview last year explaining why I think real estate investments crush stocks all day.

Stocks — fundamentally and intrinsically — have far too many variables outside of my control. Sure, the value is tied to performance, revenue, EBIT, etc. But setting aside the P&Ls, value is also tied into people and human frenzy. Large swings largely occur based on media coverage, hype, and manipulation.

It creates an intrinsic dynamic of volatility I’m extremely uncomfortable with. It’s almost like Bitcoin. There is nothing but speculation and belief in a future event — and it can get you in big trouble.

As a quick aside, on that same show I went on, Jordan Belfort, the original “Wolf of Wall Street,” said he’d “never invest in cryptocurrency.” Take that for whatever it’s worth.

Hypothetical Tim Cook from Decatur, Georgia

Uber came under fire last year due to sexual harassment issues in the corporate culture, followed soon after by the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements.

Now, let’s assume an eager young reporter from Business Insider or BuzzFeed gets a scoop that “Tim Cook” is being reported for sexual harassment by a colleague.

Eager to be first in the digital age, a story breaks with the headline, “Apple CEO Under Fire For Sexual Misconduct.”

Now the news is spreading worldwide, sending Apple’s stock into an instant nosedive.

Four hours later, news breaks that it is not Apple CEO Tim Cook, but a local warehouse manager in Decatur, Georgia. By the time the correction hits, Apple’s lost $25 billion in value.

Sounds extreme? Think this doesn’t happen? It actually does. All the time. 

On January 26, Wynn Resorts lost over $2 billion in value overnight after reports of “decades-long pattern of sexual misconduct” by Steve Wynn. The day after that, another $2 billion gone. Just like that.

And just look here: Apple lost $64 billion in value yesterday based on panic and rumors. (Or something.) Again, the “Tim Cook of Decatur” scenario is all entirely hypothetical, but this is how the beast works. 

app apple application 38629

Valuations Rooted in Reality

Compare that to income-producing real estate — the pragmatic investor’s dream — there is no razzle dazzle and spec; the value is tied directly to the income it produces.

Even if there are variables outside of my control — tenant breaks a leg, loses a job, can’t pay rent — the variable still lies under an umbrella fully under my control. If the tenant isn’t paying, you evict and replace. Simple.

(Again, when I say “stocks,” I’m talking the stock market on a macro level. There are many, many publicly traded securities that are great for wealth-building, far less volatile, remain pretty stable, and pay a solid dividend. My favorites are REITs and municipal bond funds that pay a steady tax free yield.)

Related: The Irrefutable Advantage Real Estate Investors Have Over Stock Investors

Why I’ll Always Be Bullish On Real Estate…

To me, here’s the most important fact of all: Five years ago, 90 percent of the apps on your phone didn’t exist. Shelter did. 

Ten years ago, your smartphone didn’t exist. Shelter did.

Twenty years ago, your cellphone didn’t exist. But shelter did.

Ten years from now, we probably won’t have smartphones anymore. But we’ll always need shelter.

And sure, while I did get a great return on my stock investment, the intrinsic volatility absolutely kills me. And that’s why I’ll always be bullish on income-producing real estate.

Just my $0.02.

blog ads 02

Do you agree or disagree with my take on stocks?

Share your comments below!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.