Whereas most of the competition would have a single page contract with no exhibits/attachments at all.We would agree that clarity is the key to success in all things.

But people never explain those aforementioned risks.Think most of us want to find properties that exhibit intrinsic valuation or aren't terribly deep OTM and show vast extrinsic applied to it.

I exhibit and talk at them about available tax benefits and cash flow that too many miss.

Leases with inconsistent terms, missing exhibits, or tenant improvement obligations that aren’t documented can lead to disputes or rent shortfalls.Look for:- Verbal side agreements or concessions- Unsecured security deposits- Unrecorded tenant options or rights of first refusalInadequate Entity StructuringUsing the wrong entity or failing to document internal ownership or authority can create tax exposure, personal liability, or future conflict among investors.

I’m not an attorney, and as Ned mentioned, laws around wholesaling are evolving and can vary by state.That said, to the best of my knowledge, here in Georgia, a standard Purchase and Sale Agreement paired with an Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement Rights exhibit is typically sufficient to wholesale a contract.

PSA was Exhibit 1. 

The asking price is $295,000, which is above a recent appraisal(previous buyer could not obtain Financing) of $270,000.The property exhibits strong operational fundamentals:Current Occupancy Rate: 100%Gross Monthly Income: $2,720Construction Year: 2023The facility is located in a rural area, approximately 10 minutes from the nearest town.

I would absolutely attach it to the lease as an Exhibit at least  awesome!

I had a meeting with HUD to see what they would need to transfer the contract to me and received "Exhibit 2" for Assignment of Housing Assistance Payment Contract. 

https://legalnewsline.com/stories/671358349-court-orders-ove...Looks like the sentence was Probation4/30/2025SOP - Sentencing Order - Probation 4/30/2025Looks like there were 27 defendants, but they don't specify the individual outcomes"The Court has considered the evidence which includes the testimony of witnesses, thedemeanor of the witnesses, the credibility of testimony, and exhibits admitted, as well as theparties’ arguments, and finds that Defendant L&L Investments, LLC is liable for restitution tothe Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (“AHCCCS”) in the amount of$30,236,207.52.