22 January 2026 | 32 replies
There's a tool called Depreciate'Em that is listed on BiggerPockets Software page(http://biggerpockets.com/software.html)I have found the DepreciateEm.com site to be quite useful.
25 January 2026 | 5 replies
I stepped back to focus on my professional development and technical expertise.
16 February 2026 | 21 replies
@Jacob McDonald My suggestion would be to develop your metrics....1. what type of investor are you?
16 February 2026 | 12 replies
My Concern This feels like a developing behavioral pattern: Failure to meet initial financial obligation (security deposit)Repeated late rentNon-payment of late feesVerbal assurances without performance From a risk management standpoint, this seems like: Cash flow instabilityHigh likelihood of future delinquencyPotential prolonged eviction exposure if allowed to continue Options I’m Considering Serve a final Notice to Cure / Demand for Payment requiring:Full security depositAll unpaid rentAll late fees…with a strict deadline before filing dispossessory.
23 January 2026 | 2 replies
In transitional markets like the Wake/Harnett border, location and long-term growth matter more than current school ratings or rural feel proximity to development can drive appreciation over time.
23 January 2026 | 2 replies
I’m beginning my journey in real estate development.
6 February 2026 | 2 replies
I’m a former operations manager of a real estate syndication fund, a Principal Broker with over one hundred million dollars in investment sales, and an active investor who still gets his hands dirty in long-term rentals and development.
1 February 2026 | 1 reply
South Carolina has Opportunity Zones, historic tax credits, and other economic development tools that could benefit investors, especially those improving distressed properties.Final ThoughtsInvesting in South Carolina real estate offers real potential, but it requires smart, localized decision-making.
12 February 2026 | 16 replies
What softwares do you use for your team if you don't mind me asking?
30 January 2026 | 4 replies
The rule of “unintended consequences” also leads us to conclude some other effects of buyers paying their agents directly, (without the “work around”) developed by the NAR, which was the original intention of the regulators in suing the NAR.