But I do not occupy 50% of the space which I know is a watermark of some kind.

The upper floor does not have AC and I saw some water marks in the photos.

House value at $90k is about 80% of high-water mark appreciation (prior to 2009)Currently rented at a little over $1k/month.

Two sump pumps, water marks, and rust all indicate water has been in the basement before.

You'll sometimes see high-water marks on the wood framing.The other place for sub-$200k is inside the city of Everett.

At my "high water mark" I had 200+ monthly rental checks coming in from my Northern California rentals.I also learned:By fixing up units when I bought them, I FORCED UP APPRECIATION that was not taxable today.In addition to forced appreciation, I enjoyed the market appreciation over the years.Tenants, that I never knew previous to renting to them, were paying my mortgages and ALL MY BILLS and my lifestyle.In later years, I sold by carrying the financing and collecting monthly checks from the buyer.  

I'm also going to be watermarking my own images and putting a note on the door about what the correct contacts are in case I get targeted as a landlord.

If they hit this high water mark it would significantly increase the marketability of this home

This person reached out to me today... sent me a Nevada license with a shutterstock watermark on it.  

Could these circumstances have been the manifestation of the high water mark for RE in the San Jose area?