The review board agreed to lower the value a bit more but agreed with allegations by appraisal district that my purchase was not “an arms length transaction”I purchased the home as anyone could have and had no prior relationship with seller, HUD.I have on a number of occasions gotten values reduced with a recent sale price as evidence.I’m thinking of going to arbitration or district court.

Uh-oh, I'm a little concerned about using similar explanations as an alleged dodo.

They are "soft pulls" and allegedly will not affect credit scores.

They have "emotional support pets" which I didn't charge her additional since they are alleged "emotional support" and she provided some generic computer print out and pet ID. 

@Blaison Samuel No, but a simple Google search reveals someone who has bought a ton of domains, all with the keywords "J T Foxx complaints and J T Foxx lawsuits" ......possibly an attempt to bury any criticism of the fact that there was a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment of a minor, or comlpaints of him charging up to $60,000 for whatever it is he does.http://www.bizjournals.com/prnewswire/press_releases/2012/08/24/LA62361Does that help?

If you've gotten a copy of the inspection report (and even if you've just been made aware of an issue verbally or in an email), you now have some knowledge of the alleged defect.Failing to disclose that and jump up and bite you big time.And for the real estate agents on the list, you quite probably have an ethical duty to disclose that information, even if your client tells you not to.I've gotten into this issue before with clients (as their attorney and as their real estate agent).

Tenant solely liable for any accident due or alleged to be due to the condition of the sidewalks, steps, or common areas of the premise.Q.

These guys must be using boilerplate garbage... the suit alleged things that never even happened, and the park knew that based on conversations with both me and the seller in regards to what happened. 

This thread is a good discussion not only on the allegedly breach but also on how to Partner.

But even here, if the buyer and seller are dealers ("flippers"), then money damages could be awarded.My reading of the Lawler decision is that while the trial court found the Plaintiff had proven his case and did in fact award specific performance, the appeals court disagreed and found the buyer/plaintiff did not allege and did not prove he was ready willing and able to close (an essential element of seeking to enforce the contract) and therefore was not entitle to specific performance.