The juice isn't worth the squeeze, so to speak. so yes, if you have a large enough lump sum, you likely have other ways to spend your time making money that makes letting the investment be truly passive makes more sense.

In the end, the juice isn't worth the squeeze.  

.: @K S. here is Nike:Return on Assets   9.89%Return on Equity 36.38% To be fair if I could use Chinese slave labor, turn a blind eye to forced sterilization, and organ harvesting via the Uygur population, then turnaround to exploit, fund and exacerbate the racial divide in the US for marketing purposes and my bottomline, I could certainly juice my ROE.  

I think if I can find out where to get listings off market as you suggested, my underwriting would be more fruitful for sure.

I imagine it's hard to tell from a burnt lump of plastic if the smoke detector was defective, the battery was defective, or if the battery had any juice left.Let's assume the smoke detector was operational, how does that stop a building from burning to the ground?

Keeping up with the return delta their competition was offering.2. to keep up they had to take on not so great short term or bridge debt so it juiced their out of the box return numbers.3.

For those being strategic, or utilizing good professional expert advisory, they will reap the fruits of such in coming years in a substantial way. 

I no longer accept Section 8 because the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

Here's a very basic explanation to get your juices flowing:Assume a house costs $200,000 and rents for $1,500.

The juice is worth the squeeze in the end.