Now regarding your current asset, I have witness many circumstances that have turned regular old CA multi 20 years later to mid level lottery style winnings with redevelopment.

I think 10% is just an illusion of safety for you.But that is just me.If I had a deal, I rather tell the seller I am cancelling the contract than giving in to greedy people (not accusing you).A good deal is a good deal, and there are legit ways to handle risk... basically eliminating it as much as you can.By doing due diligence on the house.All such things like "skin in the game" does is create a false illusion of safety.This because, me ALSO having something to lose is not making the deal any safer.

Why not add more FREE information then just post sharp tongued negative comments and make accusations "like he's making a sales pitch" with no reasonable basis to support this theory? 

If you're planning on getting an FHA, you'll have to put it on your name, as far as I know, is for first time buyers so a Corporation wouldn't qualify.A Corporation is a good way to cover yourself against any issue you may have wit your tenants (e.g. lawsuit..).Also, it depends on how deep you want to get with REI.Hope this helps a little,Good luck!

That wouldn't be more of an enlightening discussion now would it rather than accusing someone you don't know that they hired people from the Philippines to effectively lie on this platform.

Start the conversation by saying "I am not taking sides, but you are accused of this, there is a restraining order, therefore you cannot return to the property and I am sure you don't want to anyways."

You have an eye witness telling you that they moved out of the property.

Shortly after, I suspected her adult son was living there also, although I had not witnessed this myself and was unable to prove it.

Quote from @JD Martin: Quote from @Timothy W.: It never really was a good method. 

I love how he is accusing me of "hoping to dine and dash."