Not super expensive and well worth the money (we do this on all our projects), might not be economically feasible for all projects but something to keep in mind if the project warrants it.

Most of these areas are still affordable for an investor but still questionable whether they will maintain their value if the home values begin to deteriorate with the economic cycle.  

Economic indicators lag by several months.

Just for background:  The MFU 5+ is where the GSI is used to establish the Economic Value whereas the SFR and 2-4 units are always evaluated via Comps.

Is that good economics?

Not each market and submarket on earth has the same economic factors and supply and demand constraints.

People should be careful even though the fundamental economics growth in Austin is still extremely strong.

Through my work I have ties to the economic director and they are continually expanding, but yes I couldn't agree more.

Indeed, a lack of residential construction is one reason Americans on the economic margins are still struggling after eight years of economic growth.

He told me about his paper about the role of fresh water as a driver for economical development and why he would choose to invest in Milwaukee over many of the other booming cities in the US, many of them in hot and dry climates.