28 February 2020 | 112 replies
my question is that why are you promoting no money down and no money to invest if we need to pay for future meeting to get all of thw needed information.
27 January 2017 | 7 replies
Is it coming from neighbour sideIs it Music, animal etc
27 October 2016 | 21 replies
If I am promoting the property as a vacation rental and am getting very high rates then I would do more pro active work.
10 June 2016 | 6 replies
Most wrap promoters seem to skip underwriting school from my experience.
1 April 2016 | 13 replies
It is also potentially discriminatory in nature as only the real estate broker and the seller would have knowledge that the property's for sale and could essentially discriminate for or against certain people/buyers.I am not an attorney or anything but from my understanding when a licensed real estate broker is involved in the sale of a property, they cannot promote that property until it has been listed on the MLS.
4 April 2016 | 5 replies
If you were to see the space you would see that it really feels like part of the lower unit and I promoted it as such when advertising.
10 January 2016 | 3 replies
The fallout is, this has given the taxman cause to increase the assessments on those of us not playing this little game.Lately, a few of these "parents" have been left standing when the music stops and the house gets sold to an investor (parent taking a haircut in the process).
13 January 2016 | 2 replies
Should BP promote other background check companies on their site?
20 August 2016 | 26 replies
Any country in the world promotes tax deferred or tax free things that you can do and it is up to you to talk with an Accountant who knows what they are and head that way if you want to be in that business, like affordable HUD housing.
29 October 2015 | 96 replies
Here is what Wikipedia has to say: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veilThis part is interesting: “Piercing the corporate veil typically is most effective with smaller privately held business entities (close corporations) in which the corporation has a small number of shareholders, limited assets, and recognition of separateness of the corporation from its shareholders would promote fraud or an inequitable result.There is no record of a successful piercing of the corporate veil for a publicly traded corporation because of the large number of shareholders and the extensive mandatory filings entailed in qualifying for listing on an exchange.”