@Denise HolderPeople usually over pay when emotionally attached to a property so beware.

Below is what I used to stare at all night (I worked 60+hrs a week during the day, slept when I could and traded the London session at night)After six years, I still wasn't very profitable and emotionally sick of the +/- $2500+ daily swings so I spent a day flying from out of country to Toledo, Ohio to have some beers with @Andrew Fidler (highly recommended) and didn't leave before putting a few offers in.It's hard to believe that was actually seven years ago. 

Again, the tenants have the upper hand right now, so kid glove approach and I hope that buys me some emotional capital so they continue to pay.  

Investors operate based on numbers, rather than emotion, which makes deal flow and analysis easy compared to retail buyers.

Moves to Let Airlines Ban Emotional-Support Animalshttps://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-proposes-tighter-rules-for-emotional-support-animals-on-flights-11579720969U.S.

It is easy to deal with companies because they have no emotional attachment to the property they are selling.

Occupant retail buyers get emotionally attached to the house.  

SFH are valued based on emotion and sentiment not ROI.

If somebody is willing to pay a premium for one of my income streams, and I could pay all transactional expenses and replace the income stream with a larger income, it'd be foolish to be emotionally attached to property.The key is reinvesting the equity and not pulling out to spend on depreciating assets.

Stick to your plan, remove emotion.