Well, I guess I'm one of the ones who had good results with Lexington Law.
I used to run a credit repair seminar for auto dealerships. They would hire us to come in and teach the shoppers how to become buyers.
At the end of the day, most of the attendees would want to hire someone to do it for them. As GA has some funny laws (and, I didn't want to do it anyway) after researching the field, I started refering them all to Lexington. I would guess that over the years, I sent them 500+.
While no company is perfect, I would have to say that their results were far better than some of the comments on here would indicate. I continue to use them for my lease-purchase clients. I require all my lease-purchase clients to enroll in some type of program. That way, they have a chance of actually getting that morgtage next year. I have 3 in their program now, and all are on-track.
A few points-
1. The client is also responsible for communication with the firm. Last time I checked, my phone dialed out, too.
2. It is actually the client who ID's which accounts to dispute (I actually work with my tenants to ID them). So, if good accounts were removed, there was probably a reason.
3. Scores DO NOT always go up when you get negative items off. I had a nice couple I sent them with only 4 items on their report- a $500 limit Cross Country card (maxed out) and 3 repos from where they had co-signed for their kids. 2 months later, the repos were gone, but as their high credit was the credit card, their score actaully dropped 11 points. But, with the poison pills off, they got a car.
4. Payments are made by auto draft, and can be stopped with a simple call to your bank.
5. You have to stay on top of it- I meet with my tenants each month to go over their progress.
And a note- one poster who slammed Lexington and then went on to promote one he is marketing. That's kind of reminding of the stuff we hear everyday from all these folks running for President. Just take the high road- promote your own firm. People are smart, and can made an informed decision.
And, while the company he toughts might do a great job, the $499 fee they charge up-front is in violation of the CROA (Credit Repair Organizations Act) and my own state law. So, I could never refer them to any of my tenants, anyway.
Not to take a cheap shot, but I guess your opinion can be swayed if you're getting paid. I mean, how many folks working at Ford are going to tell you how great a Chevy is?
So, just do your own research, and make an informed decision.