Could This FINALLY be Capitulation?

Could This FINALLY be Capitulation?

Manhattan, NY · Member since 2008 · 801 posts · 61 votes

The stock market dumped all over itself today and if it does not bounce back tomorrow (fingers crossed) we may actually be close to capitulation.

Once, if, that happens we will bounce a round for a while then the beginnings of a recovery will start to peek out of the rubble.

The stock market is always a leading indicator, the economy as a whole has at least six to nine turbulent months ahead.

0Reply
55 views

12 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Investor · OH · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    18y

    That didn't look like capitulation to me. We need a BIG down day on high volume to set a temporary bottom. In addition, the next serious support level is 7,700. Could we get there from here tomorrow? Maybe.

    I also think that the ecomony has many years of turbulent times ahead (maybe a decade). As long as an increasingly small number of taxpayers are expected to provide ever larger entitlements and handouts to an increasingly large number of people, this country will be in serious decline. A TOTAL COLLAPSE of our system and a fresh start is the only hope to restore our country to greatness (in the distant future) that it previously had. This collapse WILL happen and is a 100% certainty - the only question is whether that collapse will occur now or in a few years.

    Mike

  • Property Manager · La Mirada, CA · Member since 2008 · 38 posts · 0 votes
    18y

    Mike, you are so right. Given the fact that we have chased away our manufacturing base, I fail to see how we're going to borrow our way out of the large hole we've borrowed our way into.

    Creating wealth can only happen when you create something that other people want to buy. We've let the college boys in charge of our educational system, financial system and government tell us that we should let those silly foreigners make everything we need. Whoops, now we have no means to dig ourselves out of this hole.

    I'd suggest the best place to put money these days would be to create local co-ops to lend money to start small manufacturing businesses and for local mortgages. We have the communication tech to cut out the middlemen and start a new economic revolution in this country. We don't need $1mil a month accountants running MEGACORP to make things happen.

  • Manhattan, NY · Member since 2008 · 801 posts · 61 votes
    18y

    Next week will tell the story. The volume was about 3B shares today.

    This could just be a dead cat bounce spread over the weekend or we could be wringing out the last of the miracle hoping holdouts.

    The next trading day will give more clues. But, we have to see sustained buying over several days before things are going to stop getting worse.

    Notice, I said nothing about when it will get better. The bleeding has to stop first, then the scab forms then eventually the scar.

    One is for sure, next week will have a story to tell.

  • Manhattan, NY · Member since 2008 · 801 posts · 61 votes
    18y
    Originally posted by MikeOH:
    I also think that the ecomony has many years of turbulent times ahead (maybe a decade). As long as an increasingly small number of taxpayers are expected to provide ever larger entitlements and handouts to an increasingly large number of people, this country will be in serious decline. A TOTAL COLLAPSE of our system and a fresh start is the only hope to restore our country to greatness (in the distant future) that it previously had. This collapse WILL happen and is a 100% certainty - the only question is whether that collapse will occur now or in a few years.


    Well, there are a combination of things happening that may help pull us back from the abyss.

    As I wrote on my blog today about preparing for the Obama Coronation in January, the truly wealthy pay only as much tax as they choose to pay. Since they don't tend to live hand to mouth like many Americans, they can delay or accelerate their incomes as they desire. They can choose when to realize and pay tax on capital gains, etc.

    As Obama raises the taxes on the highest income levels, the revenues coming into the Treasury will drop. They always do and they always will.

    To prepare, I am taking some capital gains off the table before the end of the year and setting it up so I can reduce my income for as long as I have to in order to pay same or less dollars in taxes as I do now.

    I am not rich by any means, but I am grateful I don't have a debt load requiring me to generate an ever larger amount of income to cover the taxes and keep my head above water.

    The net-net is as the revenues fall, there might be more pressure to reign in spending. It has happened before. Look at the Clinton budget projections before the 1994 election and after.

    But, for now, it is time to make sure we as individuals can weather the perfect storm that will hit Washington in January. Pelosi in the control of the House, Reid in control of a possibly filibuster proof majority in the Senate and Obama in the White House to rubber stamp the evermore draconian socialist "reforms" we will see from Congress.
  • CA · Member since 2008 · 277 posts · 11 votes
    17y

    ** As Obama raises the taxes on the highest income levels, the revenues coming into the Treasury will drop. They always do and they always will. **

    Preach it, brutha!

    It's just a game of tax cat-and-mouse. The truly rich will use the Tax Code as aggressively as they must to avoid Nobama's tax ax.

    Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as
    possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the
    treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes.
    Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister
    in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone
    does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any
    public duty to pay more than the law demands. --Judge Learned Hand

  • Real Estate Investor · StL, MO · Member since 2008 · 296 posts · 152 votes
    17y

    I think Friday was a bottom, though probably not THE bottom. I think we could actually see a rally between now and the end of the year-although I see this as a 'strengthen the strong, weaken the weak' rally where people harvest tax losses and offset long term gains in order to better position themselves through picking better investments or moving from individual stocks into indexes/mutual funds. Many advisers look to harvest taxes at the end of the year once the capital gains/losses are known. We have started to harvest losses already, nearly 3 months early (started in mid Sept) to take advantage of the down market and to try and lock in losses now before we move into a traditionally stronger time period.

    I would recommend to those of you with taxable accounts to think about harvesting your taxes now-there are so many options out there right now that you can save $$ on taxes and still be in the exact same position. I can sell VV and buy VLACX and take the tax loss and still be in the exact same underlying investment! Next year if the market goes down, I can sell VLACX and buy VV for a tax loss. Remember, it's only bad to sell at the low if you get out, if you sell some stocks and buy stocks back, you just saved some $$ on your tax bill while staying in the market. And saving tax $$'s can really make this market easier to handle.

    (Do you really think this is a vote Obama for higher taxes or McCain for lower taxes? I think the only difference is which taxes get raised, by how much and how often based on how much we're in the hole already and we're sinking rapidly. There's no way either of them will be able to lower taxes since the biggest federal expenses-military, social security & medicare are 'untouchable'.)

  • Real Estate Investor · North Carolina · Member since 2008 · 1k+ posts · 483 votes
    17y

    Perhaps Warren Buffett senses a bottom as he is now buying stocks for his personal account.

    Here is his op/ed piece in the NY Times:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17buffett.html?_r=1&em&oref=slogin

    One problem with real estate is that it is neither liquid nor transportable. Meaning if you own rental property in a very socialist area they'll start raising your taxes and slapping on rent controls, and so forth.

    In one of his books John Reed addressed this problem by stating that SFHs would be the best pick in such a scenario (as opposed to commercial) because homeowners constitute a much larger voting block than do commercial owners.

    In any event, I'm glad Buffett is buying stocks because that's a better indication of a bottom to me than any Princeton-educated talking head opining on CNBC.

  • Residential Real Estate Agent · KY · Member since 2008 · 44 posts · 0 votes
    17y
    Originally posted by Nc Mark:
    One problem with real estate is that it is neither liquid nor transportable.

    I get your point but guess I'm a the glass is half full type of person.

    Real estate is something you can touch, feel, and even if everything is going bad around you - you still have something thats "real".

  • Real Estate Investor · North Carolina · Member since 2008 · 1k+ posts · 483 votes
    17y

    I agree with you, Jennifer. I can 'analyze' a real estate deal much better than a stock.

    However, I just hope the day never comes when I have to go around collecting rent in fresh vegetables or possum skins or whatever my tenants have to barter as rent.

  • Real Estate Investor · StL, MO · Member since 2008 · 296 posts · 152 votes
    17y

    <>


    I won't say that Buffett's buying is a negative but it is definitely not as good as what is being touted in the press. Yes he did step in with a lot of cash for 2 companies, but he would only invest in Preferred shares, paying 10% interest along with warrants priced at currently low prices. If Warren thought things were so great, why didn't he just buy the common stock? Why did he demand the extra protection-in terms of the liquidation of the company-of Preferred status and the 10% yield. If prices are this low and this is only a temporary situation, why not buy the common stock? The price only has to move $2/share to make 10% for Warren which has been happening in a day or two. Why did he want warrants (options) instead of flat out buying at the current prices if things were so great? Also, if GE & GS, 2 of the best companies in the world, have to pay 10% to raise $$, what does that say about other companies and the state of current affairs?

    I just can't see this as the huge positive it is being made out to be.

  • Commercial Real Estate Agent · Pittsburgh · Member since 2008 · 2 posts · 0 votes
    17y

    I have to agree with Jennifer here. Real Estate is ABSOLUTELY where you should be investing your money. People will ALWAYS need a place to live wheather renters or buyers. If you used your Self Directed IRA for investmenting in real estate, any capital gains tax could be avoided by dumping the money back into your IRA....now you've got more to work with and more to retire with. A 1031 exchange is a good idea also...,the money just keeps working for you. Pittsburgh never saw a bubble, it never will and that's why people invest their hard earned money here.

  • Real Estate Investor · North Carolina · Member since 2008 · 1k+ posts · 483 votes
    17y

    Bob - check the link I posted.

    Buffett is buying _common stocks_ at _market prices_ for his personal portfolio.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.