I'm in the process of acquiring more rental investment properties and wanted to know if forming an LLC or S Corp is better? Which has better tax advantages, and which business entity will allow me to transfer the deeds from my name to the company's name faster and easier?
I'm confused as to which route to take, so i'm seeking your recommendations. :D
For the questions you asked, I think they're the same. Both LLCs and S-corps are pass through entities for taxation. You can move the property to either with exactly the same process.
Your lawyer and your accountant would be the best to give advice for which is the best choice for you. Expect, though, some conflicting advice from the two of them.
Figuring out which has "better" tax advantages is very dependent upon your particular tax situation.
There is an advantage an LLC has over a sub-S if you have others in the deal.
In a sub-S your percentage of profits follows your percentage of ownership. If you own 50% of the stock, 50% of each years income rolls up to your tax return through a K-1 form.
However, with an LLC the members can decide to disburse profits however they want and change it whenever they want without regard to ownership percentages. So, you and another investor could each own 50% of a deal but to pay them back for their upfront money you two could agree they get 80% of the profits until their capital is returned. Or however you might agree.
I use both sub-Ss and LLCs as well as full blow C corps when the situation indicates the need.
Jon gave you great advice, sit down with an attorney familiar with the type of investing you do or want to do. Do the same with a CPA. If they give conflicting advice then one of two things are true. You shared different information with them or one or both of them are not familiar enough with what you do.
My attorney and CPA are never out-of-sync on large issues they sometimes have different takes on the minute details.
I have used LLCs for many years and am switching to S-Corp now that I am going through a stringent IRS audit. Anything that goes on a schedule C is now being scrutinized now that the US is broke. Having all business activity report on the K-1 is the only way to go.
It has always been beneficial to hold rental properties in an LLC but again, get yoiur attorneys and CPA's advice on this before making a final decision.
What works for one, does not for another. There is no one way/one size on this subject.
Edited: 06/26/2010 at 07:32AM
Will Barnard, Barnard Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: info@barnardenterprises.com Website:http://www.barnardenterprises.com info@barnardenterprises.com
I definitely agree with the other posts that your attorney and accountant need to be involved and on the same page.
The potential issue with holding the rentals in an S corporation is that although you do receive passive income distributions via a K1, if you are performing services in the S corp the IRS is severely cracking down on individuals who do not receive earned income out of their S corps.
With the earned income requirement you are converting a portion of your inherently passive income from rentals into earned income subject to employment taxes.
If the goal is to have a K1 to help decrease audit risk you may want to have an LLC taxed as a partnership.
Why don't you form an LLC and get taxed as an S corp. Pay yourself a small salary as an officer and then distribute dividends as they come in. This how many businesses are set up.