Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

2,498
Posts
282
Votes
Bienes Raices
  • Orlando, FL
282
Votes |
2,498
Posts

GC's markup, how much

Bienes Raices
  • Orlando, FL
Posted

I'm planning to use a GC when I find my first house (assuming it needs enough work to require a GC). Is there a rule of thumb for what % markup I should factor in for the GC when estimating the repairs to determine how to make my offer? Thanks.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,996
Posts
17,211
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,211
Votes |
17,996
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

It's going to vary by:

- Location (higher costs = higher markup, generally)
- Contractor (good ones are more)
- Market (are GCs looking for work?)
- Negotiation (they'll take as much as they can get)
- Scope of Project (bigger projects can be negotiated to a lower % usually)

Personally, when I used to use a GC, I would pay 12% above the labor cost as his GC fee. He also did a good bit of the work, so he made money there as well. But, he would break down the numbers for me, and if I didn't like them, I could have him use my subs instead.

Loading replies...