Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get Full Access
Succeed in real estate investing with proven toolkits that have helped thousands of aspiring and existing investors achieve financial freedom.
$0 TODAY
$32.50/month, billed annually after your 7-day trial.
Cancel anytime
Find the right properties and ace your analysis
Market Finder with key investor metrics for all US markets, plus a list of recommended markets.
Deal Finder with investor-focused filters and notifications for new properties
Unlimited access to 9+ rental analysis calculators and rent estimator tools
Off-market deal finding software from Invelo ($638 value)
Supercharge your network
Pro profile badge
Pro exclusive community forums and threads
Build your landlord command center
All-in-one property management software from RentRedi ($240 value)
Portfolio monitoring and accounting from Stessa
Lawyer-approved lease agreement packages for all 50-states ($4,950 value) *annual subscribers only
Shortcut the learning curve
Live Q&A sessions with experts
Webinar replay archive
50% off investing courses ($290 value)
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted over 11 years ago

How to Buy Your First House and Investment Property at the Same Time

If you’re a new investor or looking to get started with investing and don’t live in your first investment property I have only one question for you: why not? Since I’ve been a realtor over 25 years and a Real Estate investor for 24 years, I’ve noticed a pattern in how people typically invest in Real Estate. They’ll rent, then buy their first starter home, then sell it, then get a bigger home, and then later in life think about investing in Real Estate after they’re doing well or upon their accountant’s advice. To me this seems like most people’s biggest Real Estate investing mistake. Not that they finally did it, heck my father bought his first three investment properties when he was 72! But if you don’t want to wait that long, why not live in a cheap rental while saving for that first starter home (especially if the school district doesn’t matter) with the intention of keeping that first owner occupied home for a future rental?

The first property is the most critical and theoretically it could be one of the easiest to get, as far as financing goes. Everyone can have one FHA owner occupied loan and can purchase up to a four unit property where the lender will count a large portion of the rents on the other units as income to the buyer. This is powerful since FHA may require the least amount of cash up front (which normally gives you a higher ROI) and you can buy more property if you can count rent from the other units. For example, my first property I lived in was a duplex I bought in 1989 and I still own it today, I also cash flow out the wazoo on it! If I were to go and buy a duplex now, later in life, I would need 30-35% down plus closing costs to acquire a duplex today that’s non-owner occupied. That’s not a good use of my capital plus if you sell your first property to get rid of the debt so you can move up to your 2nd owner occupied unit, you lose your initial down payment and closing costs on the first property. Not to mention the appreciation, cash flow, and write-offs you could have by continuing to own and rent out the place!

Years before working for me and my company, an employee of mine was just out of college and had a really great job. She decided to buy a nice 3 bedroom house in a decent part of town and rent out two of the rooms to friends. So she lived almost for free right up until she got married; when her husband (an accountant no less!) told her to sell her house and move in with him. She did, and since then her decent neighborhood became a very nice one. She bought the house for $150,000 and now it’s worth $350,000. The appreciation alone is enough to put her kids through college. So how come no one ever talks about this? To date I’ve kept the first 3 properties I’ve ever lived in and they all make me money today. The only difference with investing in Real Estate this way is you make your “need” more disciplined and you only “spend” time to save a little more money to move into the next property. Before you acquire your first property try to envision your long term Real Estate goals, and see if living in your first investment property could be right for you. Chances are it'll work and you’ll be glad you did it, I know I am.


Comments (6)

  1. Hi Dave, thank you for sharing your story.  My question is I just recently sold my property due to paying off some debts. So, now I am interested of purchasing an investment property.  Would it be possible to purchase a home and investment property at the same time.  Any advise?    

    Thank you, 

    Jimmyly 


    1. Hi Jimmy,

      Thanks for reading.

      And it's definitely possible! I actually wrote an article on the main BP blog about this strategy:

      https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2015/10/0...

      In the article I illustrate how you can do this when buying your very first home but much of the strategy still holds true buying homes intentionally to become rentals. In theory, you could essentially buy a home every year or two each time you move. You only get so many mortgages in your personal name, so why not get as many assets this way as possible?

      I actually think this is a great way for an investors to acquire property for a few reasons: One is, like I said, you have to live somewhere so why not live in what will be an investment? Two, when you sell a regular property you're most likely losing what you spent on closing costs when you first purchased, not the case if you keep that property and it cashflows as a rental. And three, if you were to sell a property you lived in instead of keeping it to rent, you'd be giving up the years you put towards the 30 year mortgage while you were living there. And lastly, owner occupied financing can give you access to some of the best terms, rates and down payment, so it wouldn't hurt to keep a property like that as a rental because if you're looking at it from a yield perspective, the less total cash into a deal that still has cashflows positively, the higher the percentage of yield.

      Best of luck, hope this info could be of help.

      - Dave


  2. This was such a great article thanks for the share !!


  3. Hi Dave, excellent advice!  Appreciate you sharing it.


  4. I know quite a few people who got their start living in their first investment -- a multi-family. The only real disadvantage I see is living right next to your tenant, which could lead to problems. Otherwise, it can definitely be a great way for individuals to get a feel for the business of landlording. If you're not made for the headaches that come with being in the business, you'll learn very quickly...


  5. Thanks for the story, Dave Van Horn! My second property (first investment, after a quick flip) was a duplex that I lived in 1/2 and rented the other out. I love that place!