Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

4
Posts
1
Votes
Tim Haley
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Orlando, FL
1
Votes |
4
Posts

Downtown Orlando Building

Tim Haley
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Orlando, FL
Posted

There is a 4 story building in the middle of downtown Orlando that will be up for sale in the very near future. Asking price is 4.2 million and it's 42 thousand square feet. The owner thinks whoever buys it should tear it down and put high rise condo's. I advised him against it because its old building with a lot of history to the city. The question I'm asking is do you ever feel that the money you could make is not worth changing an area's heritage or history.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,132
Votes
Jon Holdman#3 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,132
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman#3 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

IMHO, if non-owners want to control what is done with a property they need to buy it. If the new buyers want to knock it down and building something different, and that's in conformance with planning, zoning, and building codes, they should be free to do it. If someone feels it should be preserved as a historical landmark, they should buy it and do that. If the owner is willing to accept a lower price in exchange for imposing such a restriction on the buyer, he's free to do that. I don't think he's under any obligation to make such a donation to the "area's heritage or history".

Loading replies...