The laws bar landlords from raising rent above 33% of a tenant's income
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-san-francisco-rent24-2009jun24,0,568083.story
Karl Marx would be proud!
The laws bar landlords from raising rent above 33% of a tenant's income
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-san-francisco-rent24-2009jun24,0,568083.story
Karl Marx would be proud!
At what point are lawmakers at the highest and lowest levels, going to realize that they are destroying any and all incentives to doing business in this country?
Joshua Dorkin, BiggerPockets, Inc.
E-Mail: webmaster@biggerpockets.com
Telephone: 877-831-4704
Website: http://www.biggerpockets.com
Be sure to check out the BiggerPockets Blog at http://www.BiggerPockets.com/renewsblog/
At what point are lawmakers at the highest and lowest levels, going to realize that they are destroying any and all incentives to doing business in this country?
I thought they did know and were doing it intentionally. How else can they justify taking over all private business? I heard that Joe Biden wants to run BiggerPockets! It won't be the same without you Josh.
Mike
yeah, exactly. I tend to be very conservative about money; I even look at graduated income tax as and extremely stupid policy. Why on earth would you punish people for making more money? It's like when countries in the UN try to say they give more money than the US - because what they give equates to a higher percentage of their GNP than what the US gives as compared to their own GNP. But what they fail to acknowledge is that 10% of 1 million is still more than 99% of 1 thousand... I know I'm simplifying things but still.
The movie Pacific Heights should be must viewing for any wanna-be landlord, especially one in San Fransicso. Tenants who understand the laws can take advantage of the system to the detriment of landlords. This is just another example of a system gone horribly wrong.
:cool:
If you think it's bad now, wait few years. When the trend of supplying "affordable housing" for home buyer is completely reversed, The power of renters is only going to get bigger and stronger. I'm afraid that the city by the bay will experience further drop in rental property prices.
.... And yes, Richard. "Pacific heights" is a must for any landlord, especially in San Fran.
I consider myself pretty well versed in economics, but I don't fully understand how this will effect their housing market and rental economy.
Wouldn't this drive away landlords in droves and in turn cut the supply of rentals available for the people this plans to protect?
Wouldn't the landlords that are left only accept wealthy tenants and not rent to the middle and lower classes?
Wouldn't that essentially mean more houses on the market and in turn drive down the price of housing?
Wouldn't that lead to more foreclosures?
one problem is, in my opinion, that there is a never-ending supply of idiot wannabe investors who will swarm in and pick up rental properties at low cost as they're being dumped by smart landlords who've had enough of the BS and want out.
Incredible article. Why would anyone in their right mind 'invest' in San Francisco?
What landlords need is a strong national lobby.
Joshua Dorkin, BiggerPockets, Inc.
E-Mail: webmaster@biggerpockets.com
Telephone: 877-831-4704
Website: http://www.biggerpockets.com
Be sure to check out the BiggerPockets Blog at http://www.BiggerPockets.com/renewsblog/
Will Landlord be permitted (or will they require) to view the tenants annual 1040 or pay stubs or other proof of income?
Markets do adjust. Landlord find other ways of increasing the cash flow coming in or decreasing their expenses (deferred maintenance). One market adjustment is for existing Landlords to exit the market, leaving less experience Landlords to deal with the new restrictions. Other owners could convert some housing inventory to other uses.
Most disturbing to me is the apparent unconstitutionality of San Francisco dictating changes in existing leases.
Article I, section 10, clause 1 of the United States Constitution specifically states that "No State shall … pass any Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts."
But hey, this must be the "Change We Can Believe In".
Kevin wrote:
"Landlord find other ways of increasing the cash flow coming in "
What a Nobel idea... Hey tenant, remember that parking space you've got for free? Guess what, it's now $40 per month. Also, the storage space ( The detached garage in SFR), this is another $25, sorry, I feel your pain. Oh, yes, almost forgot, your pet which had only initial additional deposit? Now $15 a month too. Oh and by the way, if you don't like it, why won't you right to your congressman... Uh?
We have a lobbying group, at least here in Ohio. In Ohio, the state REIA (OREIA) has a lobbyist that has been somewhat successful in working with the legislature to stop these stupid laws. In addition, the REIA works with the big apartment associations and Realtors when there is common ground.
It sounds like California investors need to get their act together!!! It's time for them to start fighting the socialists.
Mike