When funding a flip, do you prefer separate financing for purchase and rehab, or a single structure that covers both?

Many experienced investors evaluate:

• Simplicity of having one capital source

• Draw process efficiency for renovation funds

• Impact on cash flow during the project

• Flexibility if the scope of work changes

• Exit strategy alignment from day one

Choosing the right structure can streamline execution and reduce friction during the rehab phase.

For active flippers, what structure has worked best for you? Combined financing or separate sources for purchase and renovation? Why?