Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Chicago Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

166
Posts
67
Votes
Eric L.
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
67
Votes |
166
Posts

Moving in without a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) in Chicago?

Eric L.
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

I was talking with an fellow Chicago based investor today and the topic came up about moving in without a CO. We were curious: Is there anyone who has (or has directly heard of) experience with this and is willing to share, whether good or bad? As an owner occupant, is this possible? As a landlord, is it possible to let tenants move in prior? What happens if the city inspector sees furniture and signs of living during a final inspection?

I've heard GC's say "it's Chicago, of course it's okay!" however others (myself and this other investor included) are not so confident. It was an interesting conversation but I am curious to hear what others with experience report.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,544
Posts
2,364
Votes
Jeff B.
  • Buy & Hold Owner
  • Redlands, CA
2,364
Votes |
5,544
Posts
Jeff B.
  • Buy & Hold Owner
  • Redlands, CA
Replied

Occupancy w/o the Certificate means *IF* there's any accident or fire, your insurance will not cover the 'event' and you may have server liability.

Not SMART!!

Loading replies...