Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
~$5,000+ potential annual savings on vetted partner products
10+ deal analysis calculators with ready-to-share reports
Lawyer-reviewed leases for every state ($99/package value)
Pro badge for priority visibility in the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.

Posted about 4 years ago

Why Use List Scrubbing For Direct Mail Marketing Campaigns?


Do you have a real estate investor direct mail strategy? If so, it’s also advisable to check your mailing lists at least twice a year to ensure that the lists are up-to-date. From low response rates to returned mail, a cleanup and audit of your mailing list are important for cost savings and marketing efforts.

Have you heard of list scrubbing that saves money and time? When you run your email list through a scrubbing service, you get updated information to fix any out-of-date information. List scrubbing can help you save money and wasted mailers because you aren’t sending them out to the wrong addresses or to anyone who has passed away. You can then update your email lists for future mailings.

Simply put a cleanup on your calendar to follow through with twice a year. Easily prevent those decreased response rates and wasted spending on bad and returned addresses.


Comments