Will definitely check the job/population growth patterns there.

A good PM should track these tenants closely, communicate patterns to you, and advise if/when it’s time to escalate toward stronger action.

On the other hand, recording the deed establishes a fact pattern worth pursuing. . . .

Quote from @Jackie Carmichael: I’ve been watching a pattern repeat over and over in this market. 

Many local markets are showing a similar pattern, ultimately that buyers are more cautious and deliberate, yet homes under $500,000 that are move-in ready are still in high demand.

I have been hearing similar patterns from multiple sources lately and the data seems to be pointing in the same direction: Are we on the edge of great opportunity in real estate again? 

The company will be fully running in 2025 and is in the process of raising capital (32:47-50).This evidence showcases a pattern by Santarelli of raising money, by offering returns that defy logic.

From my seat as a lender, I see the same pattern: flips create quick liquidity but are hard to repeat when inventory tightens; DSCR rentals scale because the financing is driven by the asset’s income, not W-2s.What’s worked best for many of my clients is a hybrid: flip for chunks of cash, then redeploy into DSCR holds for compounding cash flow, depreciation, and long-term upside.

In your fact pattern ($300 Box 1 income, -$2,000 rental loss), the proper MA treatment would normally be:- Net zero current year taxable income in MA- ~$1,700 suspended passive loss carryforward to MASo if TurboTax is limiting your MA allowable loss to $15 because it’s blending in other states’ K-1s, that’s not consistent with how MA expects the form to be prepared.

It's a medium grey/tan color that blends well with different color patterns.