If the case was filed strictly for nonpayment, introducing a non-renewal can be seen as switching to a no-fault holdover.MA courts are very technical about this and often require the case to match the notice exactly.Timing of the non-renewal notice matters.If it was served after the eviction was filed, judges frequently require dismissal and refiling.If it was served before filing, sometimes it can be pled correctly from the start.Month-to-month vs. term lease.Since the lease ends Feb 28, issuing a non-renewal prevents an automatic month-to-month rollover, which is smart.But it can conflict procedurally with an active nonpayment case.Judges don’t like mixed theories.MA Housing Court typically wants one clean basis: either nonpayment or expiration of tenancy, not both at once.So yes, in MA it is very common that:• Non-renewal during a pending nonpayment eviction• Forces dismissal• And requires refiling as a holdover after lease expirationThat said, refiling as a holdover after Feb 28 can sometimes be faster and cleaner than fighting procedural issues mid-case.You’re not wrong to question it, but procedurally this is one of those states where doing the “right” thing can still reset the clock.

Once you get it permit-ready, you can get a construction loan, but construction loan lenders want to make sure you are qualified and can execute the project competently since construction has things go wrong a lot.  

You’re not wrong: in a lot of higher-cost markets, hitting even 0.5% rent-to-price is the norm, which makes it really tough to cash flow from day one.That’s why many investors look out-of-state to places like Memphis.

The biggest risk with flips is not the work itself, it is buying wrong, underestimating repairs or running out of cash before the project is done.

Don't take it the wrong way, it's just business..and since we're looking to open the hospitality kind..hire the best and brightest..so the CEO can focus on the vital decisions. 

.: You forgot the “post replying group…”1) Copy and paste AI response2) State the EXACT same thing 4-5 other people already said, especially without acknowledging the other responses  3) Gives an answer that is flat out wrong/illegal/opposite of ideal, especially without saying they “think” or “believe” but stating as a fact  4) Gives an answer that shows they didn’t read the post or understand it.

Correct me with I am wrong: "under contract" is with motivated seller?

Don’t Mess This Part UpQuick STR question I see trip people up all the time:Your rental averages 7 days or lessYou materially participatedSo yes — you likely qualify for the short-term rental “loophole.”Great.But then comes the part many investors get wrong Do you report the income on Schedule C or Schedule E?

Guess I went about it the wrong way, my first deal was 100+ doors lol it’s absolutely possible for someone new, but it’s def a team sport and the overall team’s experience is absolutely necessary.

Maybe for properties that has clear cut comps but for more coplicated properties it needs human i tried this program for 3 properties completely wrong.