26 September 2025 | 10 replies
"unreasonable", "ocasional", "seemed to be in breach of rules" etc, but the matter is the your certain case only.
2 October 2025 | 18 replies
Jules, you're spot on with your view of expectations being unreasonably high.
29 September 2025 | 46 replies
Not completely unreasonable for someone whose time is justifiably valuable.He's probably as skeptical of you as you are of him.
7 September 2025 | 5 replies
Considering all of that, the fee does not seem unreasonable to me.
1 September 2025 | 8 replies
Challenges:1) Timing - PMCs don't always have time to communicate with an owner as roughly 20% of the time they need to make a "spot" decision.2) Owners NOT Responding Timely - this gets so bad at times we've had to resort to messages ending with, " if we don't hear back from you within X days, you'll force us to use our best judgment subject to your portfolio's available funds".3) Unreasonable - some want MORE than 3 bids, want bids on nonsensical stuff. 4) Desperate Owners - we know many have mortgages to pay, but when something needs fixing, we are NOT a lender to cover the cost and pay ourselves back with future rents!
28 August 2025 | 4 replies
This will translate to them charging what may seem like a lot of money for a small problem, as the chances of having to deal with a problem for an extended period of time are real from that point on.That being said, if the other landlord is being unreasonable and requires a contractor to do the work, you may not really have a work-around.
22 August 2025 | 24 replies
I don't particularly care right now - all of my responses are essentially "thanks for the kind words it was great having you as a guest" or similar, but on the day when you get an unreasonable review and you want to respond it seems like no one will be able to see it.
27 August 2025 | 24 replies
Of course, guests need reliable access, but giving only one hour to fully resolve an issue like a lock malfunction feels unreasonable.
14 August 2025 | 1 reply
Then, realizing taxes reduced her profit, the landlord increased the demand yet again, to $725 per month.The Special Needs Board paid an astounding $4,000 before finally refusing to continue under these fluctuating, unreasonable demands.When we finally went to court, Bethany’s case manager detailed the situation, including the landlord’s threats of sending Bethany to a homeless shelter if payments weren’t made.