I would also lock in finishes and materials upfront so there’s no room for interpretation.

When investors loop a broker in early, they can usually get:• A no-cost opinion on whether the deal is actually lendable• DSCR and Non QM pre-analysis using real underwriting criteria• Feedback on whether the numbers support all cash, leveraged, or walk away• Updated rate scenarios and leverage options based on real-time pricing• Risk red flags that free tools do not highlight• Confirmation of what lenders will and will not count as qualifying income or rent• Guidance on capital structure for BRRRR, flips, or long-term holdsIt is similar to working with a financial advisor because the tools matter, but having someone who knows how to interpret the data matters more.

I don't interpret the new (2025) statutory language to exclude accrued interest in the public bid amount.

I've pointed out IRC 469(c)(7)(B) and Publication 925, but our CPA is saying that we are interpreting this incorrectly.

Courts interpret those differently.

So each of us must read and interpret the signals the market is giving.

In your case, you’re at least getting steady rent while you learn the ropes.Once you get the actual lease and estoppel, feel free to share the key points and I can help you interpret anything that looks weird.

However, the local interpretation and enforcement vary widely.

If there are notice requirements, it's often prudent to begin those steps as a precaution but if this is a tenant you believe will catch up once their employment payment freeze ends it's important to communicate your desire for the tenant to stay so they don't interpret the notice incorrectly or completely shut down on you. 

@Leo Parshukov it's NOT the screening app that makes a difference, it's knowing how to interpret the data!