NEW: BP Podcast 66: Flips, Apartments, & Protecting Yourself From Professional Tenants with Michael Blank

Hide this

From the BiggerPockets Blog

 BiggerPockets Blog »

Jump to Forum View All

Click a category below to view different forum categories.

BiggerPockets

General Info

BiggerPockets Q&A, Site Questions, & Announcements

1509 topics, 14381 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:16AM

BiggerPockets Exclusive PRO Area

117 topics, 838 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 09:08PM

New Member Introductions

10862 topics, 85369 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:26AM

Real Estate Success Stories

392 topics, 6108 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 04:55AM

General Real Estate

General Real Estate

Buying & Selling Real Estate

5909 topics, 46613 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:25AM

Renters

642 topics, 5803 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:24AM

Get Foreclosure Help - Help Stop Foreclosure Forum

316 topics, 2557 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 03:58AM

Home Owner Association (HOA) Issues & Problems Forum

237 topics, 1608 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 04:51PM

Do it Yourself

653 topics, 6259 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:00AM

Reviews & Feedback

Real Estate Deal Analysis and Advice

3659 topics, 29333 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:16AM

Real Estate Guru, Book & Course Reviews and Discussions

1131 topics, 11539 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 06:52AM

Ask About A Real Estate Company

736 topics, 7288 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:41AM

Real Estate Investing

Real Estate Strategies

Wholesaling

5587 topics, 43666 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:24AM

Rehabbing and House Flipping

3324 topics, 30915 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:18AM

Real Estate Development & New Home Construction

551 topics, 4678 posts — Last Post 04/14/14, 01:02AM

Innovative Strategies

700 topics, 5998 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:40AM

Tax Liens, Notes, Paper, & Cash Flows Discussion

864 topics, 6661 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 06:29AM

Rent to Own a.k.a. Lease Purchase, Lease Options

690 topics, 4865 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 05:52AM

1031 Exchanges

143 topics, 1052 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 05:39PM

Foreclosure Investing

General Foreclosure & Pre-Foreclosure Forums

1686 topics, 11281 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:28AM

HUD, VA, and Tax Sales

414 topics, 3088 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:35AM

REOs

1213 topics, 10565 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:23AM

Short Sales

1533 topics, 13117 posts — Last Post 04/15/14, 07:10PM

Landlord & Tenant Forums

Landlord & Rental Property Questions

7191 topics, 70574 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:24AM

Mobile Homes & Mobile Home Park Investing

636 topics, 5127 posts — Last Post 04/15/14, 09:59PM

Investor Basics

Starting Out

7682 topics, 60312 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:26AM

Investor Psychology

430 topics, 6092 posts — Last Post 04/14/14, 06:53PM

General Real Estate Investing

4711 topics, 37157 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:26AM

Real Estate Investor Marketing

1730 topics, 14084 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:20AM

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial Real Estate Investing Forum

1408 topics, 8977 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 09:03PM

Multi-Family and Apartment Investing

1103 topics, 9172 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:16AM

The Business of Real Estate

Real Estate Technology and the Internet

Real Estate Technology, Social Media & Blogging

638 topics, 4884 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 06:48AM

Business Basics

Goals, Business Plans & Entities

828 topics, 7527 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 08:32PM

Real Estate Finance & Legal

Financial, Tax, and Legal

Tax, Legal Issues, Contracts, Self-Directed IRA

2781 topics, 19988 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:49AM

Property Insurance

309 topics, 2042 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:10AM

Personal Finance Discussion

328 topics, 2718 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:55AM

Loans, Mortgages, Credit Lines

Private & Conventional Lending Discussion

2825 topics, 19668 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 05:42AM

Creative Real Estate Financing

1207 topics, 8759 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 08:16AM

Crowdfunding Real Estate

35 topics, 455 posts — Last Post 04/14/14, 02:14PM

Real Estate Professionals

Real Estate Professionals

Real Estate Agents

1205 topics, 7951 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:56AM

Bankers, Lenders, and Mortgage Brokers

440 topics, 1917 posts — Last Post 04/15/14, 07:37AM

Contractors

265 topics, 1669 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:19AM

Local Real Estate

Local Real Estate

Local Real Estate Networking & Recommendations

1983 topics, 11577 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 06:23AM

Americans & International Real Estate

161 topics, 566 posts — Last Post 04/14/14, 11:19AM

Foreigners Buying in the USA

62 topics, 409 posts — Last Post 04/10/14, 06:27AM

Canadian Real Estate

64 topics, 426 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 08:34AM

Marketplace

Real Estate Marketplace

Real Estate Marketplace

14990 topics, 53871 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:57AM

Real Estate Events and Happenings

162 topics, 2455 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 07:54AM

Off-Topic

Off Topic

Off-Topic

2902 topics, 32399 posts — Last Post 04/16/14, 03:07PM

Housing News & Real Estate Market

914 topics, 8350 posts — Last Post 04/17/14, 06:32AM

BiggerPockets Real Estate Investing Summit

97 topics, 1751 posts — Last Post 04/10/14, 02:27PM

BiggerPockets Resources

Forums » Creative Real Estate Financing » Dodd-frank or SAFE act, and balloon payments?

Dodd-frank or SAFE act, and balloon payments?

48 posts by 16 users

Signup

· Central Point, Oregon


I'm a realtor in Oregon. My principle broker last week dropped a bomb on us, saying that balloon payments are going (have gone?) bye bye, and that most people who are going to carry notes on their own properties, will now have to be licensed.

First of all: What? -- In doing my searches of the two acts, I can't find a single thing about balloon payments. Is he confusing these for something else?

Second, Has this impacted your business? If so, how? And what workarounds have you found?



Real Estate Investor · Squaw Valley, California


Hi, you might contact @Bill West, as he always seems to have knowledge and input on this subject. However, a few of the attorneys I have contacted and asked about this say they do not yet understand this law completely, as well as the wonderful guys who created it. Best of luck!!



Real Estate Investor · Squaw Valley, California


I appologize, I meant Bill Gulley....



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


LOL, Under the Act a balloon can't be required until one third of the amortized principal has been paid.

You'll find it contained in the seller financing issues which are about 2/3s of the way through the Act. It's not a large section but puts the brakes on quickly to old ways of doing things.

Homeowners are usually exempt from the act. States may exempt sales to a 2/3 a year, then a license will be required.

If you're doing seller financed deals, better become familiar with the Act. :)


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


· Central Point, Oregon


Thanks, @Bill Gulley. I'll look into it... There's something about the Safe act as well, but I'm not sure when which applies.



Real Estate Investor · Anaheim, California


Does any of this apply to NOO? It is my understanding the Safe Act only applies when a homeowner is involved.



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


The SAFE Act applies to any financing method, by cash or equity, which is secured by properties that are 1-4 single family dwellings, including mobile homes and vacant land zonned for sfd residential use. It does not apply to commercial financing.

There are exemptions for homeowner's selling thier primary residence and some limitations as to the number of loans made in one year by states. If you are in the business of financing RE deals with cash or equity you'll need to address the new requirements and comply, the intent is really aimed at RE operators.

Such financing is more difficult but not impossible as you can go throgh a mortgage broker/originator or an attorney.


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Real Estate Investor · Charlottesville, Virginia


Bill Gulley your replies are much appreciated and expertise in this business evident. Are you for hire regarding creative financing options to help others to continue to run business as normal? i.e. How can one obtain your advice regarding compliance with these and other issues in their (my) real estate business. There are very few attorneys with knowledge of this stuff in my area...(Virginia)


Small_blue_ridge_mobile_homes_logo_225x133_white_backSam Parkins, Blue Ridge Mobile Homes
Website: http://www.blueridgemobilehome.blogspot.com


Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


Thanks Sam, but I'm retired, but don't tempt me, lol

Best way to get my opinion is to post the question here on BP! That's free! :)


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Real Estate Investor · California


Come on Bill, there is so much conflicting "STUFF" on BP re D/F that confusion runs rampant. At least tell us what you read to stay current. You are much appreciated!



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


Thank you!

I read through the SAFE Act, studied the verbage pertaing to areas of interest, skipping the banking issues since they don't pertain to me anymore.

I also looked at a few state statutes and an update, I have not seen the final assuming the intent did not change, I'm sure it did not. Just undersatnding that each state will have its own version, but from the beginning HUD was charged with enforcement of the original intent, so sticking to that you can safely assume the states have complied.

It also provided that in the event HUD determined that the state law did not sufficiently address the intent, that HUD would then apply the federal interpretations.

There is no way I can keep up with all the states and what they have done, I suggest that those engaged in such business to look up thier own state's regulation. If there is an issue that is not clear anyone can certainly bring thier question here, specifically and we can address the matter.

On another related topic, the newly formed Federal Consumer Protection Board may have more far reaching actions that may pertain to RE. While congress is holding up all they can with the new agency they have already acted in several areas. They will be able to act in individual transactions and enforce any federal law appropriately.

@F Foster, I appreciate the feed back, thanks, I realize that I'm the unusual one here on BP with a different mindset and that it is not always welcome, telling people why they can't do something or what might be wrong. I received a recent PM where someone told me that it finally dawned on them why I was so negative and thanked me for my regulator style of thinking. I have seen several on here change thier original thinking in some aspects over time as well, :). I'm not always correct on a detail but I'm confident I will be in general aspects, at least to the intent of how something should probably be accomplished in good faith. Thanks again!


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Real Estate Investor · California


@Bill Gulley You are my crystal ball that tells me were to be cautious. I am too old to go to prison or loose what little I have. If memory serves me, the Federal Consumer Protection Board is lead by a friend of Senator Elizabeth Warren, one smart lady who knows how the cow ate the cabbage. I don’t think she will be taken in by Dodd-Frank or Safe Act. Do you know of any case law that has occurred re: Dodd Frank or Safe Act?
Regards Foster



Real Estate Investor · Central Valley, California


@F Foster I too am interested in an CA case law in regards to Safe Act/Dodd Frank. I'm not too concerned about selling with seller financing to investor buyers and have done so since the acts passed. My understanding is that those are "commercial" enough to keep me out of trouble. But never say never when it comes to a defaulting borrower and what strategies they or their attorneys will use. To be honest, at this point I doubt I'd be wiling to offer selling financing to someone I didn't already have a business relationship with.

Starting in about 2006 or so, it was my long-term plan to buy, rehab and to sell to owner occupants. That's off the table now until we know more the legal definitions and we see some case law. CA's version of the Safe Act is silent on seller financing. The ideas thrown around out there about a seller using a licensed broker to originate to be compliance don't seem well thought out to me. "Offering" and "negotiating" according to the law are supposed to done my LMOs only. If that's the case, I don't understand how I can even suggest to a buyer or advertise in my listing that I'll carry back a loan with 25% down (or whatever). Is that not "offering" a loan and "negotiating" terms?

Anyone with seller financing/Safe Act case law examples, please chime in!



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


You are correct about Warren, a very sharp and hard nosed looker I might add (lol). She is not against these Acts, they are right down her way of thinking and she will be supporting them 100% I'm sure.

The only case that I have heard of was one in RE where they used the Postal Inspector General to nail a mortgage investor/broker scamming investors and nailed him for mail fraud. That's what I meant, that by intergrating various agencies and using the laws on the books the FCPB will have far reaching effects.


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Private Money Lender · Denver, Colorado


Bill,
You have several compliments here, but I'll throw you another one. You are great for detailed replies and staying in bounds, or out of the grey areas. It is a blessing to BP that you are retired and have the time to assist other here. Thanks!



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


Thanks Ted, I was typing and missed your post. Seems i get into alot of grey sometimes, lol...

@K. Marie Poe I think you are taking a wise approach, especially in CA with its recent MB statute that seems to be in the mill.

If any state does not adopt specific aspects of the SAFE Act, the federal Act prevails, if CA is silent they must simply be assuming the federal version alone.

The term "offering" is confusing, there is a split there, offering specific terms and conditions is for the MO or attorney after due diligence wich is the intent as mentioned, it specifically allows a seller to say they will consider financing or make an offer to finance but not as to specific terms as the seller is not qualified to originate terms necessary for any borrower. Might think of it as an initial offering and the final "offering of terms and conditions".

And, it may be years before you get to read case studies on any seller financed matter. I suspect you'll see it in CA before many other areas if it's left up to the states to enforce matters on the front lines.

It's just my guess that HUD has other things to do and it would have to be a serious infraction before they would go after a seller/originator of a single home (especially since so many exemptions have been adopted) Most likely it will be some dealer, selling several units as thier business before HUD would be turning up. And, most likely it will only surface if deals start blowing up and complaints are filed.

The recent FCPB issue was on the local news here and it was a MB in Mo. Ar., the guy got 3 years and was ordered to repay the losses. Sounded like he just got in over his head to me, he may not have had the intent to defraud investors originally, but couldn't cover losses...JIMO.

Here is another issue too as to case studies, HUD prefers to slap hands out of court quickly and efficiently, many issues don't go to court, they plead out to a closed hearing or agreement, pay fines and go on the HUD naughty list and the public may never hear of the issue. At least that seems to be the SOP for the midwest region out of KC, Mo. I've had several meetings and casual opportunities with the past Regional HUD Dir. and he spoke softly and carried a big stick but was keen on PR and the political nature of the office as well.

So relying on past convictions to form any views on the matter could take years to get a clear picture.

Seems like we had a discussion here on BP about CA Real Estate Broker/agents being exempt from the offering issues when act in the presentation of and representing clients of a transaction. I'm clearly understanding that they are not MOs authorized to originate loans off the street, but as to the transaction they are related to.


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Residential Landlord · Lima, Ohio


Thank you @Bill Gulley !


Small_logo_03Ben Leybovich, JustAskBenWhy.com
E-Mail: [email protected]
Telephone: 1.888.508.9643
Website: http://www.JustAskBenWhy.com
Ben Leybovich, Syndicator / Creator of Cash Flow Freedom University http://www.JustAskBenWhy.com


· Central Point, Oregon


Hey @Bill Gulley, You seem extremely well learned in the area of real estate law, and just wanted to say thank you for giving us a (considerable) chunk of your time answering questions!

I also hear you when you say that if we (I) are to get into seller financing, it's important to become familiar with the acts in question. That said, it seems to me that it is a big couple of documents, and reading through it line by line would take a while. Do you know of any site or publication that breaks down the two acts into digestible formats?



Real Estate Investor · Springfield, Missouri


Cody, I have been searching for you and really have not found an appropriate information site other than HUD-SAFE Act Requirements. But that's no short cut.

I also went to a note investor site, but it is rather slanted IMO.

I have also found many updates and some info that HUD appears to have changed or is taking different views on but not sure if they have been adopted or are current.

I see it's a real mess!

Seems like conflicting info as to exemptions, owner selling thier own OO home or is it a NOO home, 1 deal in 12 months, 5 deals in a year and then in 3 years, then contractors being exempt, then not, and

A scary three year right of recession for the buyer to resind the deal if the lender failed in due diligence in ascertaining if the note was affordable, hitting on the ability to pay, if the originator failed to prudently originate the note the borrower get all thier money back! I wouldn't have a problem with this but new investors aren't me, don't mean to brag but they are saying the deal has to be underwritten prudently, that's an impossibility for a first time seller unless they get help.

I mentioned no balloon until a third of the principal had been paid, ooops, looks like no balloon, then no balloon in the first 5 years, so I guess that's up in the air from the original version.

I also see note investors are pulling thier hair out, as I mentioned here in the "What do you want Mr. Note Buyer" thread here on BP.
The future note holder can be at a loss if the note was improperly originated!

Guess I'll start studying the SAFE Act again and get with HUD.


Financexaminer@real estate investor dot com


Real Estate Investor · California


Marie Poe-Thank you for your comment re: "commercial." You make me consider that any buyer who will not be an occupant, may be "commercial" and the more active as an investor, there more "commercial" he may be. Thank you. I had not considered that.

Bill Gully-I tend to disagree with you that Senator Warren would support these Acts 100%. I refer to her book, "The Two Income Trap". She will oppose any part of the Acts that she feels are unjust. Safe Act and D/F lookout!





Sign up