Which tenant would you pick?

Which tenant would you pick?

Rental Property Investor · San Jose, CA · Member since 2015 · 401 posts · 221 votes

I have just finished remodeling a SFH rental property in San Jose area. My goal is to rent it out long term. I have 2 top prospective tenants (the rest are screened out).

#1: Section 8 tenant approved for 5 rooms. Mexican lady in her early 40, which her husband also early 40, 4 kids, 1 grand kids, and 2 foster children. Her current landlord passed away with no heir. She has been living rent free until the bank start to foreclose on the house. 

Pro:

- She has a government jobs for 12 years 

- Show proof that she has paid the landlord her share of the rent every month in the last 2 years leading up to his passing. 

- She stayed at her current place for 8 years, so she is likely to stay longer

Con:

- Her current house is in a more seedy part of town.I asked to visit her house (I want to see how clean she lives), and she seems a bit uneasy about letting me come right away & asked to schedule a time. I'm a bit worry that she won't keep the house in good sharp

- Many kids, which will add wear & tear to the house.

- She might have 1 or 2 adult children living with her as well

- She has one eviction back in 2004. I credit her for being honest, as this should have been gone from her record. 

- She has petty thief conviction when she's 18 or 19.

#2: Non-section 8. Asian girl looking for rent for her extended family. 3 sisters, 1 brother in law, 3 older ladies (mother, aunts), and 1 nephew.

Pro:

- 3.5 adults income (4, but one of her sister has minimum wage job)

- We saw that she keep her current house pretty clean.

Con:

- If they happened to split up, each one of them won't have enough income to pay rent.

- Since they pay by themselves, it's probably a bit harder to raise rent in the future.

We are aware that we not suppose to discriminate base on rate, and we don't. We only  include the renter's rate to give you a complete picture.  What do you think? Which one would be the better tenant? Thank you.

0Reply
52 views

Most Popular Reply

Russell BrazilBusiness Member
Moderator
Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
11y

@Albert Ng You have created a huge liability for yourself by posting this message.  Some of the criteria you have put forth to determine who you should rent to include race and familial status. You have also posted this incredibly illegal post with what I guess is your real name.  I almost have to wonder if this is a fake because I am so shocked at it.

See this reply in the discussion

31 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Rental Property Investor · Tucson, AZ · Member since 2014 · 63 posts · 37 votes
    10y

    Wow.  Where to begin.

    When you are screening for a tenant, legally you are supposed to have a written set of criteria that you must follow when screening. This written criteria should be provided to the tenant and signed so they understand what your criteria is. Whoever FIRST qualifies under this criteria is the person you should be accepting into your property. 

    Specifically mentioning the race of both potential parties is quite possibly the most stupid thing I have read on BP. If you had no intention of using their race in the selection process you would simply leave it out of your description/question. A useless statement at the end along the lines of "of course i'd never use their race as apart of the selection process" isn't going to help. Again if you had no intention of using race as a part of the process you'd leave it out. 

  • Consultant · Oklahoma City, OK · Member since 2015 · 122 posts · 34 votes
    10y

    #1 has an eviction and #2 lied to you. 2 big no-nos in my opinion.

    Maybe the answer is neither...

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.