Thoughts on Goverment Rental Property Inspections

Thoughts on Goverment Rental Property Inspections

Investor · Oxford, MI · Member since 2016 · 110 posts · 41 votes

Our rental is in Waterford MI and after the housing crash Waterford created a "Rental Property Annual Operating Fee" of $50.00-$25.00 a unit for all SFH & Apartments (high density per building is less but still $200.00 for a basic 4 unit building. Which is really not only a fee but also random scheduled inspections which can invoke additional fines. The inspections cover everything from Fire Alarms and handrails to plumbing codes and egress points. They notify every non-homestead home owner and that you need to sign up/register for the annual fee per unit.

I don't necessarily feel code enforcement is an issue but the NOT voluntary inspection is basically a warrantless infringement into the homes.  Now if say a tenant/anyone was given a avenue to say hey I have no fire alarm in my building and thus ensued a inspection that's one thing.  But the random inspections are not ok in my view - there should be a warrant process - Not a hey were inspecting and found these violations x & x etc.

I fretted the first one as they provide a list and some items were a bit crazy.  The "inspection" though however these last few times were fairly simple ten minute visits from various code enforcement individuals.  I had to install a anti siphon/back wash valve on the utility sink and we removed the water softener as it was not plumbed "correctly" - could not lock the bypass.  Thus far we have between about 500 into the annual fees and items addressed from "inspections" and this is for just one property.

Anyone have their own thoughts/experiences to share regarding?  I guess for some cities the Annual Inspections has been challenged and found unconstitutional.

0Reply
8 views

1 Reply

Jump to latestLatest
  • Davisburg, MI · Member since 2015 · 26 posts · 10 votes
    9y

    I have gone through one inspection when I first brought my Waterford rental to market, I had to register and have it inspected.  It was a bit of a pain in the *** but that was more due to having a tenant in that could care less about being there when they agreed to be, allowing the management company take point and having a repair company that missed a few things a few times (I thought being a hands off landlord was possible, it didn't work for me).  I think you are right that there should be some initiation process, not random, but oddly enough we don't get a say in the town we own property, unless we happen to live there and a bad tenant could initiate out of spite.  Being a laissez-faire capitalist I say let the market decide.  If tenants don't want to live in a ******, unsafe home let them walk.  If they just want to hand over responsibility for their safety they should have to hire, on their dime, an inspection from a third party company.  If that company finds problems then the landlord and tenant can either work it out before a lease is signed or agree to disagree and walk away.  But I digress, I can dream right?    

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.