Do You Actually Trust Zestimate When Evaluating Deals?
I’ve been thinking about how often sellers (and even newer investors) rely on Zillow’s Zestimate when trying to determine property value.
On the surface, it makes sense — it’s quick, easy, and gives you a number instantly.
But in practice, especially with off-market deals, I’ve seen Zestimate be way off.
For example:
- It doesn’t factor in true property condition
- It ignores investor-specific metrics like ARV and repair costs
- It doesn’t account for seller motivation or deal structure
I’ve seen properties with a $350K Zestimate realistically trade closer to $220K–$260K once you actually break down the numbers from an investor perspective.
It seems like Zestimate works more as a general reference, but not something you’d rely on to actually make a buying decision.
Curious how others here approach this:
👉 Do you use Zestimate at all when evaluating deals?
👉 Or do you completely ignore it and rely on your own comps/analysis?
I’ve been exploring ways to use more data-driven approaches (including AI) to bridge this gap, but interested to hear how everyone here handles it.