All 97 major US metros ranked by gross rental yield (Zillow data, June 2026)

All 97 major US metros ranked by gross rental yield (Zillow data, June 2026)

Member since 2026 · 1 post · 1 vote

I pulled Zillow's Home Value Index (ZHVI) and Observed Rent Index (ZORI) for every metro in their top 100 and computed gross yield = (median rent x 12) / median home value. Same formula for every market, so it's apples-to-apples. 97 of the 100 have both series. Top 10:

1. Jackson, MS - $215,622 value / $1,489 rent - 8.29%

2. El Paso, TX - $233,297 / $1,528 - 7.86%

3. Pittsburgh, PA - $235,539 / $1,523 - 7.76%

4. Chicago, IL - $359,888 / $2,275 - 7.59%

5. Lakeland, FL - $298,822 / $1,848 - 7.42%

6. Toledo, OH - $206,185 / $1,276 - 7.42%

7. New Orleans, LA - $264,891 / $1,617 - 7.33%

8. Columbia, SC - $257,718 / $1,555 - 7.24%

9. Syracuse, NY - $271,597 / $1,614 - 7.13%

10. Augusta, GA - $254,362 / $1,506 - 7.11%

Three things that stood out to me:

Chicago at 7.59% is the real outlier. It's the only top-5-by-population metro anywhere near the top of this list - every other high-yield market here is small or mid-size. If you want yield without giving up liquidity, depth of tenant pool, and exit options, it's basically the only large market still offering it.

Rust Belt and Deep South dominate, which is the usual story, but the spread has widened enough that financing costs eat the entire return in the bottom half of the list.

The bottom is brutal for cash flow. San Jose 2.83%, Salt Lake City 3.46%, San Francisco 3.47%, Los Angeles 3.63%, Seattle 3.65%. At those yields you are buying appreciation and nothing else.

Important caveats so nobody misreads this: this is GROSS yield. It does not subtract taxes, insurance, vacancy, capex or management, and those vary enormously by state - a 7% gross in a high-tax, high-insurance market can net worse than a 6% gross in a cheap one (Florida insurance being the obvious 2026 example). Treat it as a screen for where to look, not a buy signal. It's also metro-level medians, so submarket variation inside any of these is far bigger than the gap between adjacent rows.

Happy to run cuts for anyone - ask for a state or a specific metro in the comments and I'll post its numbers.

Disclosure: the full ranking below is my own project and the complete dataset there is a paid download, so treat this paragraph as self-promotion and ignore it if you like - everything above is the actual content of the post and needs no click.

I put the full ranking of all 97 metros plus the CSV (keyed on Zillow RegionID so it joins onto other Zillow series, includes the 5-year rent trend) together here in case it's useful: https://smeltworks.com/atlas/

1Reply
10,223 views

Most Popular Reply

Investor · Milwaukee - Mequon, WI · Member since 2010 · 5k+ posts · 7k+ votes
1mo

The metric is so overly simplistic, that the result is basically useless for investment decisions. And for $19 you can buy a list that AI can just tell you..

Ask any Chicago investor if they feel like they are in the top 10 lol

For anyone new: invest at home. If that is excessively expensive find the closest market that is feasible. You have a knowledge gap and a time gap. Pick a city you know, maybe used to live at. Or one you often are, maybe visiting family, driving distance is best, short direct flight is second. 

Narrowing your gap is much more important than any ranking.

See this reply in the discussion

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Milwaukee - Mequon, WI · Member since 2010 · 5k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    1mo

    The metric is so overly simplistic, that the result is basically useless for investment decisions. And for $19 you can buy a list that AI can just tell you..

    Ask any Chicago investor if they feel like they are in the top 10 lol

    For anyone new: invest at home. If that is excessively expensive find the closest market that is feasible. You have a knowledge gap and a time gap. Pick a city you know, maybe used to live at. Or one you often are, maybe visiting family, driving distance is best, short direct flight is second. 

    Narrowing your gap is much more important than any ranking.

  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    1mo

    1a) Is that for new properties or 50 year old ones? For apartments or SFR? High rise or garden style? 500sf studio units or 5,000 sf homes/penthouses? Is it downtown or in the hood, or in the fanciest suburb/school district? Does it even include insurance, property taxes, or local taxes? Is it STR/MTR/LTR? Furnished or unfurnished?

    1b) If it isn’t by property type, zip code, and per SF it means NOTHING.  After you have all that. Then you can compare it to similar properties, of the same type, in the same zip code. You still can’t compare it to other cities and certainly not other states.

    2a) This ranking has the same problem it’s always had. It’s literally a list of properties that aren’t appreciating as fast as the rest of the country.  There’s a reason it’s filled with properties at half the national average.  All your real wealth will be made with appreciation these properties don’t have. And all your “excess” profits will be lost when the capex is the same for a $200k home as a $500k home. 

    2b) MN is FULL of small towns where homes worth less than $50k, sometimes $30k that rent for $500+/mo.  That’s 12-20% crushing every city of the list. But you will probably lose your shirt. Unless you get lucky when you sell the land after you demolish the house because it’s not worth a new roof, fixing framing/foundation issues, or re-plumbing, whatever happens first.  These homes have seen 100 winters and freeze thaw stresses.  Populations have been falling for 20+ years hence no appreciation and a solid “value trap”. 

  • Jacob CamhiBusiness Member
    Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 131 posts · 40 votes
    1mo

    that's a solid start using gross yields as a first screen, but the true picture always comes down to net cash flow after operating costs, which can really flip things.

    for any market on your top list, i'd then dig into the county auditor's site for real property tax data and local insurance quotes for a typical investment property.

    also, check the municipal websites for any rental registration fees, zoning restrictions, or specific utility costs that might be unique to a submarket.

    a 7% gross in one market could easily net less than a 6% gross in another once you factor in those big variables like insurance in florida or property taxes in chicago, like you pointed out.

    have you started comparing those specific operating costs in a few of your top markets yet?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.